Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 11:32:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 11:14:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 10:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 10:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 10:27:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 10:16:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 10:09:00 AM (view original):
If I call a plumber and cannot pay him he will not fix my toilet. If I call a doctor and cannot pay him he should not be forced to treat me.

**** the poor, amiright

The poor who have iPhones, wear Air Jordans and have Playstations? Or the actual poor?

If you call a plumber, will he fix your toilet for free? Yes or No?

Phones are pretty vital to life these days. Also, these people are still poor. Common myth.

No.

Phones are in no way essential to life. That is ridiculous.

For my job, they are. Maybe not an iPhone but a flip phone for most people is.

I said iPhone. I said Air Jordans. I said Sony Playstation.

They are not "poor". They are gaming the system.

Yes. You can have those things and still be poor.

If you can afford these luxuries, you are not poor. If you have these things and cannot afford food, your priorities are off track.

Thank you KO. Tang is insane.

You can still be poor by being under the poverty line.... You can be poor and still be able to feed your kids.

Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
You can still be poor by being under the poverty line.... You can be poor and still be able to feed your kids.

Sony Playstation with a TV and games is like $1000. Air Jordans are like $150. IPhone with plan is like $40/month. You are not poor if you have all that. You are gaming the system.

If you can feed your family, you're not poor. Tang, you may want venture out of Central Kansas and into a 3rd world country. Start telling them that people with luxuries like cable tv are poor and see what kind of reaction you get.

Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.

Maybe we can all self-identify as "poor"; then the gov't can pay for all are needs & wants - I'm still trying to figure out why the Dems don't raise the minimum wage to $100/hr, why not $300/hr - wouldn't that solve all the problems -- why worry about a "living wage", when the Dems can give us all a "LIVING WAGE" --- then we wouldn't have to be "poor", or would we all be "poor"?

Parenthetically, you have to love the policies the Dems create to help the poor - QUERY: where would the "poor" be if not for charity (an American taking after tax dollars to help his fellow citizen - all the while the Dems claim there're the only ones concerned with the "poor".

if there were less dems we would have less poor.....we would also have less people.

Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.

I agree that most who have that are either stupid and/or irresponsible. I don't know every single situation so I won't say all.

Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 4:45:00 PM (view original):
If you can feed your family, you're not poor. Tang, you may want venture out of Central Kansas and into a 3rd world country. Start telling them that people with luxuries like cable tv are poor and see what kind of reaction you get.

We have a different definition of what poor means. You can feed your family and still be poor.

Posted by pennsylvania on 9/19/2018 4:54:00 PM (view original):
Maybe we can all self-identify as "poor"; then the gov't can pay for all are needs & wants - I'm still trying to figure out why the Dems don't raise the minimum wage to $100/hr, why not $300/hr - wouldn't that solve all the problems -- why worry about a "living wage", when the Dems can give us all a "LIVING WAGE" --- then we wouldn't have to be "poor", or would we all be "poor"?

Parenthetically, you have to love the policies the Dems create to help the poor - QUERY: where would the "poor" be if not for charity (an American taking after tax dollars to help his fellow citizen - all the while the Dems claim there're the only ones concerned with the "poor".

I don't support minimum wage and clearly charity isn't enough to do everything.

Posted by tangplay on 9/19/2018 5:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 9/19/2018 4:45:00 PM (view original):
If you can feed your family, you're not poor. Tang, you may want venture out of Central Kansas and into a 3rd world country. Start telling them that people with luxuries like cable tv are poor and see what kind of reaction you get.

We have a different definition of what poor means. You can feed your family and still be poor.

So enlighten us on what it means to not be poor.

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 10:10:00 AM (view original):
Taint, wylie and Tang. Not so fast. Don't dodge. Are you calling me a liar when it comes to premade salad prices at Market Basket. Yes or No?

I have no idea. I don't live near Market basket (whatever that is). I don't know why you would lie about it though.

Posted by cccp1014 on 9/19/2018 2:05:00 PM (view original):
Thank you KO. Tang is insane.

that's right...call anyone who does not agree with you insane, a moron, an idiot, a traitor....

Posted by all3 on 9/19/2018 4:50:00 PM (view original):
Tang, just once, please explain to us how a person can have an iPhone, Jordans and a Playstation and still be poor, without being either stupid and/or irresponsible. I think we'd love to hear how you think that's possible.

I'm glad I decided to open this one. I think I know the answer to this and bet Tangy don't.............

Here's how that's possible............ it's called theft.