Welp, I can't find the original WaPo article. When you search for it, all you get is article's about the lawsuit. If anyone wants to help me, I would greatly appreciate it. It is possible that they took it down I guess.

Posted by laramiebob on 2/20/2019 7:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/20/2019 6:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bagchucker on 2/20/2019 5:34:00 PM (view original):
omg a teen was talked about wrong

how dare they



did he lose a tooth? did someone steal his jacket? WTF are you even talking about

Somebody sucessfully sued McDonalds for selling hot coffee.

I think the teen has an excellent chance of winning some money.

Why?

What did the media outlet DO that "damaged" him?
What did they say that was "slanderous"?

I'd like to know.
I've never heard the alleged offensive words or actions.
What did they do to the kid?

I didn't say an excellent chance of winning the lawsuit, I said an excellent chance of winning some money. The primary purpose of filing is to try and force The Washington Post into opening up their checkbook. A friendly bet that it settles out of court...and settlement means $$$.

You still didn't answer his questions my dude.

Posted by tangplay on 2/20/2019 9:20:00 PM (view original):
You still didn't answer his questions my dude.

Oh...I have no idea. I haven't seen the details of the lawsuit and I never saw the Washington Post coverage on the story. Winning money through settlement has nothing to do with merit.

Posted by bad_luck on 2/20/2019 5:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/20/2019 5:56:00 PM (view original):
When my parents came to this country they had $100 and didn’t speak the language. They did OK. I dont but bad lucks privilege bullshit.

The essence of privilege.

"I (or someone) did fine. Why can't everyone just do that?"

LOL they weren’t privileged. Learn to read.

Posted by tangplay on 2/20/2019 9:20:00 PM (view original):
You still didn't answer his questions my dude.

You went to college to “have a good time” so you don’t deserve answers

You are comically ignorant.

Posted by tangplay on 2/20/2019 11:01:00 PM (view original):
You are comically ignorant.

Opinions vary. You’re sheltered and ignorant about life in general

Topic of the day: Global Warming

Is it real or a hoax?
If it's real, is it manmade or a natural cycle?
How do you combat it?
Was is government's role, if any, in combating it?

Posted by strikeout26 on 2/21/2019 8:28:00 AM (view original):
Topic of the day: Global Warming

Is it real or a hoax?
If it's real, is it manmade or a natural cycle?
How do you combat it?
Was is government's role, if any, in combating it?

Real. Man-made. Not sure. Big role.

Posted by strikeout26 on 2/21/2019 8:28:00 AM (view original):
Topic of the day: Global Warming

Is it real or a hoax?
If it's real, is it manmade or a natural cycle?
How do you combat it?
Was is government's role, if any, in combating it?

Real (Not up for debate)
Manmade (But who cares)
Ask a scientist. IDK. Create a panel on it or something.
Do whatever the scientists say, within reason.

It's obviously a gigantic problem. The biggest of the 21st century.

It ****** me off when people ask 'manmade or natural' because
1. It's manmade
2. Even if it wasn't, it is still a problem.

Actually, I think the question of manmade vs natural is relevant. You know I think man plays a major role in it. You have proofread one of my articles on it. But to play the devils advocate here, if it's a natural cycle then it is reasonable to assume that the cycle will reverse without humans trying to influence the reversal.

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/20/2019 10:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 2/20/2019 5:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 2/20/2019 5:56:00 PM (view original):
When my parents came to this country they had $100 and didn’t speak the language. They did OK. I dont but bad lucks privilege bullshit.

The essence of privilege.

"I (or someone) did fine. Why can't everyone just do that?"

LOL they weren’t privileged. Learn to read.

No, I’m calling you privileged.

Posted by strikeout26 on 2/21/2019 9:08:00 AM (view original):
Actually, I think the question of manmade vs natural is relevant. You know I think man plays a major role in it. You have proofread one of my articles on it. But to play the devils advocate here, if it's a natural cycle then it is reasonable to assume that the cycle will reverse without humans trying to influence the reversal.

Well then it's still a problem. We are already seeing the effects. What if it doesn't reverse? Then we die. Risk/reward there doesn't seem preferable.