Posted by nitros on 2/13/2019 11:41:00 AM (view original):
I have to believe it's a personal reaction to this being a popular coach, and would be much different if it were someone less known or disliked.
Actually, I have no issue with someone taking over an account to skip the existing process (which I believe turns people away FWIW) as long as the coach plays by the rules. The entire reason people take over accounts is to skip the existing process.
nitros
Ditto what nitros said.
The existing structure is not good. I would think anyone who's played this game and gone up to D1 would agree it's a waste of time (once you've learned the game) and requires little effort. I think that's one reason why so many people don't have a problem with it. Four plus months of gameplay that you're not very interested in is tedious.
Seble, you say you have to enforce the rule, that you can't pick and choose when to enforce them in order to credibly do so. I've been in your position before and I understand that. It is a thankless task. Yet on this side it feels like you *are* picking and choosing here, and it makes me very uncomfortable as a consumer of your product. I've never heard of this rule, never seen it enforced, never thought it unfair. You've said it's been around since the beginning, but since I can find no evidence of it, I can only assume you're referring to the Fair Play Guidelines. As a consumer, it feels like something was just decided to be unfair, and someone is being punished for having done it four years ago. At this point, I don't expect you to reverse your position. I'm simply making this statement to let you know why this situation bothers me.
At the least, I think you've discovered most people don't have a problem with someone skipping the time and effort to advance to D1. There's a reason for that, and hopefully that reveals to you an opportunity to improve the game.
2/13/2019 12:34 PM (edited)