Posted by Tiptop00 on 6/15/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):
Anyone ever tried a 4 guard lineup with a motion offense?
the bigger question then does it work well with motion is, what is your defense? also i'm assuming that by 'guard' you mean 'player with guard-like properties', not listed position.
basically, the problem with 4 guard offenses is there just isn't enough of a payoff to offset the rebounding. if your 3/4 are really small forward who are listed as guards, that wouldnt be so bad, but with regular guards, its really kind of a mess. in the press, you get more value from trapping and having speed at the 4 than other sets, but even in the press, i'd prefer a quality post defender (def, ath, blk) over a speedy per-defense oriented guy. in man or zone, its not even close.
offensively, there is a limit to how much offensive talent you need on a team. you want to get guys who are really good scorers, and give them most of the shots, instead of having a bunch of decent guys sharing the load. you should be able to get plenty of per scoring by running 2-3 guards, really by the 3rd, if you don't have enough per scoring, adding a 4th guard is probably not the way to solve that problem.
also, the extra bh/pass at the 4 doesn't really help you. it might save you a fractional turnover, but that is barely going to make a dent in the several rebounds per game you are losing.
i was really keen on making a 4 guard lineup work - and it certainly can work, if your definition of work is to do pretty well. but if by work, you mean not being disadvantaged against a more traditional lineup, then i don't think it really pans out that way, generally speaking. your best bet would be to run fb/fcp where you can tolerate less rebounding and need more stamina, both of which make the 4 guard lineup more viable. i've definitely seen some good fb/fcp teams that were like, 3 guards and a sf and a c.