Posted by DoctorKz on 9/13/2019 7:57:00 PM (view original):
I'm not sure how to judge it. Last year's final standings of Round 1 saw approx 20% of the field average less than 75 wins. This year's field has less than 20% at or below .450 win pct..Feel free to evaluate more in depth...I really don't think too many teams are benefiting a lot from those death spiral teams.
Let's define a death spiral team as one with a winning % < 0.300. For calculation purposes, we'll say the avg. winning % of said teams is 0.200.
There are 17 such teams in this WISC Round 1 (and 7 that are below 0.200).
Each one of these death spiral teams play their conference mates 12 times for a total of 132 such games. Therefore, approximately 40 wins in total will be gifted to their conference mates per death spiral team. That translates to around 680 free wins, which is 1.46% of the 46656 total wins that will be recorded in WISC. The difference between a 0.548 cutoff and a 0.523 cutoff is about 2.5%.
Last year, there were 7 such teams in Round 1 (and none below 0.200). For calculation purposes, we'll say the avg. winning % of said teams is 0.250.
That's only 33 gifted wins per death spiral team, and 231 total free wins, which is 0.66% of the 34992 total wins that was recorded in last year's Round 1.
Overall, it looks like about 1/3 of the increase in wins needed to make Round 2 can be attributed to Death spiral teams.