Posted by Uofa2 on 12/24/2019 11:55:00 PM (view original):
Totally normal posts from a totally normal Trump supporter.

Merry Christmas to all my fellow nerds on WIS. This is my favorite hobby and I couldn't do it without you. Thank you all and have a happy new year.

And now back to the totally normal posts from a totally normal Trump supporter.

ET....stop being such a scrooge.

Posted by all3 on 12/25/2019 11:13:00 AM (view original):


HTH are any of us ever going to know what the "real" truth is, when there are always going to be two sides telling the opposite thing?
99.99% of the time, somewhere in the middle will be the "truth". Too bad our 2-Party system doesn't allow anyone to be in the middle.

Um. No. There are objective facts. Like in 2016 every single Republican backed Biden and Obama, like the IMF and Ukrainian anti corruption folks and the EU, when we withheld funds until they fired a corrupt prosecutor who wouldn't go after the former head of a company Biden's idiot kid was on the board of. Thats an objective fact. Just like its an objective fact nobody brought up this non-issue when Trump gave aid to Ukraine in 2017 or 2018. Objective facts. OH BUT WHAT CHANGED IN 2019, was it an anti corruption candidate won in Ukraine? Was it a corrupt prosecutor was ousted? Or was it Biden was running? Literally all three of those questions and the answers are, objectively, bad for Trump. But yeah, theres no middle? Sure.

You obviously have a very interesting definition of "truth".

Or an HONEST one.

Yeah, because EVERY Republican backed Obama and Biden. WTH?

Posted by Uofa2 on 12/27/2019 12:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 12/25/2019 11:13:00 AM (view original):


HTH are any of us ever going to know what the "real" truth is, when there are always going to be two sides telling the opposite thing?
99.99% of the time, somewhere in the middle will be the "truth". Too bad our 2-Party system doesn't allow anyone to be in the middle.

Um. No. There are objective facts. Like in 2016 every single Republican backed Biden and Obama, like the IMF and Ukrainian anti corruption folks and the EU, when we withheld funds until they fired a corrupt prosecutor who wouldn't go after the former head of a company Biden's idiot kid was on the board of. Thats an objective fact. Just like its an objective fact nobody brought up this non-issue when Trump gave aid to Ukraine in 2017 or 2018. Objective facts. OH BUT WHAT CHANGED IN 2019, was it an anti corruption candidate won in Ukraine? Was it a corrupt prosecutor was ousted? Or was it Biden was running? Literally all three of those questions and the answers are, objectively, bad for Trump. But yeah, theres no middle? Sure.

COOKOO!

Posted by all3 on 12/27/2019 12:19:00 PM (view original):
Yeah, because EVERY Republican backed Obama and Biden. WTH?

Yes. Every Republican backed Biden withholding the aid in 2016, along with the IMF, EU, and anti corruption forces in Ukraine. This is a fact. Find one quote from 2016 to refute me, please. This is because supporting democracy in Ukraine was a bi-partisan issue, and in order to do that, we had to force their corrupt prosecutor out. But now, in 2019, after Trump gave aid in 17 and 18 mind you, suddenly that bi-partisan act was corrupt? After nobody said anything at the time because they agreed, and nobody said anything in 17 or 18....suddenly, it’s an issue. Gee. What changed.

Again, find a quote from 2016 that says differently. You can’t.

And then think about what changed. This is so markedly obvious.

Then again your reply of no facts or evidence kinda shows me all I need to know.

Posted by all3 on 12/28/2019 12:17:00 AM (view original):
You're the one making the claim. You find me a quote from 2016 that says they did.

Hahahhaha nah, fam. A very quick google search shows what I said. If you’re too lazy to put in the work, that’s on you.

COOKOO!

HELP US Ufoa2! YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE WHO CAN SAVE US!

Posted by Uofa2 on 12/27/2019 12:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 12/25/2019 11:13:00 AM (view original):


HTH are any of us ever going to know what the "real" truth is, when there are always going to be two sides telling the opposite thing?
99.99% of the time, somewhere in the middle will be the "truth". Too bad our 2-Party system doesn't allow anyone to be in the middle.

Um. No. There are objective facts. Like in 2016 every single Republican backed Biden and Obama, like the IMF and Ukrainian anti corruption folks and the EU, when we withheld funds until they fired a corrupt prosecutor who wouldn't go after the former head of a company Biden's idiot kid was on the board of. Thats an objective fact. Just like its an objective fact nobody brought up this non-issue when Trump gave aid to Ukraine in 2017 or 2018. Objective facts. OH BUT WHAT CHANGED IN 2019, was it an anti corruption candidate won in Ukraine? Was it a corrupt prosecutor was ousted? Or was it Biden was running? Literally all three of those questions and the answers are, objectively, bad for Trump. But yeah, theres no middle? Sure.

What's the difference between an objective fact and...a fact?

Alternative Facts-----KellyAnne Crackpipe