Posted by doubletruck on 12/20/2021 8:02:00 PM (view original):
I enjoyed great success for many seasons drafting old-time lefty Pastorius as my 4th starter, but lately he’s having a hard time reaching even .500. I suspect the problem may lie in subtle changes I’ve made in lineup choices and ballparks.
Sometimes those little changes impact things in ways you don't easily see...
I ran similar style teams in several leagues over a period of time while testing pitching fatigue and most of these teams had similar players from one team to the next, but there were some changes. I ran'00 Donlin at 1B, '97 Joyce at 3B and '19 Peckinpaugh at SS for a few teams and they were largely successful winning 110-115 games and many playoffs. I subbed out Donlin, Peckinpaugh and Joyce for cheaper options that had similar profiles and similar RC from their PH. I then took the $ saved to upgrade a couple of pitchers '96 Maddux to '97 Maddux (for example). On paper, these teams were better: Same RC, ballpark, and defense, with better pitching, but they consistently won fewer games (90-95). When looking at the individual players performances the new SS, 3B, & 1B matched or outperformed Donlin, Joyce & Peckinpaugh offensively across the board and their defensive numbers were right on par or better, as well. I couldn't figure out why such a difference in win totals.
Then I looked
much closer and saw that the small gain in offense and even defense was worth roughly 0-1 extra win per season, and my pitching improvements were worth 0-.5 extra wins per season, but the impact my more hitters than Donlin/Joyce/Peckinpaugh were saving my opponents roughly 45-50 errors per season. In other words, Donlin, Joyce & Peckinpaugh were reaching on error 45-50 times per season MORE than the hitters I had drafted to replace them. These ROE were hurting their performance stats so it didn't look like they were doing as well as they were, but in actuality, these ROE were contributing more in net wins than the offset from normal offense/defense and pitching improvements. Then, they also had better speed ratings than their replacements and had less GIDP, as well. I couldn't come up with enough of a gap to make up the full 20 win discrepancy I was consistently seeing, but found enough of a gap to know that those hidden factors like ROE were contributing much more than it appeared initially or than what could be seen on an individual player by player comparison.
12/21/2021 1:56 PM (edited)