Nice pick. I strongly considered 2014 after missing out on 2011. Even after posting 1982, I immediately felt remorse about passing on 2014. Great pitching plus Trout. I'm hoping the great defense that 1982 provides will offset the crappy pitching that I will end up with.

I'm sure I screwed this up, but I was also between 2012 and 2014 for the previous pick. The only reason I didn't go 2014 was because it's likely 7 pitchers and 1 hitter, but still under 600 IP total. So next team pick, you probably need to go heavy on hitters, but still need a bunch of starting pitcher innings to fill out the staff. I went with more balanced approach to leave options open. Might be a bad call

This might be the draft I'm least excited about. Especially picking so low.

Having a team for each franchise, I think my least favorite is the Rangers draft. Can't wait to see what kind of crappy starting pitchers I end up with. This is why each franchise will get 6 teams to advance... the Rangers may get 2-3 below .500 teams advancing.

Seriously? First 2011 Angels goes one pick in front of me, then 1998 Mets goes one pick in front of me. Damn it! Need some time.

Posted by schwarze on 4/4/2024 5:02:00 PM (view original):
Seriously? First 2011 Angels goes one pick in front of me, then 1998 Mets goes one pick in front of me. Damn it! Need some time.

For what it's worth, I immediately regretted not taking the 1998 Mets right after I chose the 2014 Angels. I still do.

These drafts will feature a lot of remorse. Who made these rules anyway?

It was hard to narrow my choice down. Kept going back and forth between two very similar seasons. Very close call.

2008 New York Mets

2005 New York Mets

I can't believe the 1971 Angels were still available . . . . . . . . . . said noone ever. This is going to be a nightmare.

After pedrocerrano selects his Mets season, only one other Mets team can be taken, since njbigwig also has to take the Mets with his 2nd team in this league.

2002 Angels