Catholic
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
Jeffrey McKeag |
Sr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
27 |
12 |
75 |
1 |
9 |
2 |
27 |
99 |
79 |
90 |
77 |
82 |
39 |
B- |
Robert Taliaferro |
So. |
PG |
5 |
7 |
-1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
34 |
30 |
76 |
6 |
19 |
2 |
1 |
85 |
67 |
29 |
39 |
75 |
68 |
C |
Larry Bell |
Fr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
58 |
21 |
29 |
12 |
14 |
70 |
52 |
49 |
33 |
63 |
63 |
C |
Paul Thompson |
Fr. |
PG |
3 |
11 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
72 |
18 |
71 |
1 |
25 |
2 |
19 |
71 |
55 |
73 |
73 |
71 |
45 |
B- |
Melvin Moore |
Sr. |
SG |
0 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
47 |
43 |
75 |
9 |
48 |
4 |
22 |
79 |
79 |
35 |
53 |
78 |
42 |
C+ |
David Decoteau |
Fr. |
SG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
54 |
15 |
26 |
1 |
13 |
38 |
43 |
37 |
64 |
73 |
73 |
C |
Brian Fisher |
Sr. |
SF |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
40 |
51 |
44 |
48 |
66 |
31 |
58 |
44 |
63 |
49 |
66 |
91 |
39 |
C+ |
Michael Pitts |
Jr. |
SF |
3 |
9 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
54 |
53 |
53 |
36 |
61 |
30 |
60 |
44 |
30 |
49 |
59 |
83 |
55 |
C |
Reginald Kim |
So. |
PF |
7 |
9 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
10 |
2 |
56 |
36 |
43 |
65 |
21 |
33 |
76 |
10 |
14 |
33 |
62 |
77 |
55 |
B- |
Drew Daley |
Sr. |
C |
4 |
4 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
53 |
34 |
82 |
37 |
69 |
43 |
43 |
15 |
35 |
70 |
88 |
57 |
C |
Larry Dressler |
Sr. |
C |
0 |
1 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
-3 |
1 |
37 |
84 |
30 |
68 |
83 |
36 |
42 |
33 |
24 |
21 |
42 |
64 |
45 |
C |
Michael Massey |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
27 |
72 |
11 |
52 |
44 |
14 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
59 |
82 |
D- |
15-5 RPI 7 (last year 12-2, RPI 7 at the improvement summary). Ridiculous offensive efficiency (52% FG, 46% 3's as a team) with mediocre defense and a good job on the boards. McKeag will leave a big hole when he leaves; Thompson will fill in somewhat (and is still high potential in PE), but then there is no 2nd PG returning. Larry "Liberty" Bell is my favorite of the FR, blue in ATH, REB, DEF, LP, BH, and P. That's a great SF profile in two seasons. With all our recruits from the Dakotas, Decoteau is from North... Carolina. He's blue in SPD, LP, PE, and BH. A perfect reaplcement for Melvin Moore. Worth noting Kim's improvement, particularly in ATH/SPD, where he will get to the 45/55 range that Wojtanowski had so much success with. If Massey were to go to confession, he's admit that he doesn't have that much improvement left on his modest ATH and SPD (or defense), but his penance includes projecting to 95+ REB, 70+ LP and 45+ in P and BH. With Bell putting up 70+ P at SF, the future P balance could be one of the best in D3.
Salisbury
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
James Booth |
Jr. |
PG |
0 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
30 |
41 |
70 |
2 |
38 |
2 |
22 |
65 |
57 |
73 |
33 |
76 |
40 |
C+ |
Nicholas Leary |
So. |
PG |
6 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
11 |
8 |
1 |
10 |
-6 |
8 |
5 |
63 |
42 |
74 |
6 |
38 |
1 |
28 |
46 |
48 |
26 |
85 |
66 |
36 |
B- |
Hugo Lee |
Fr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
76 |
4 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
69 |
53 |
37 |
39 |
78 |
54 |
C |
Warren Moody |
Fr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
63 |
1 |
48 |
1 |
15 |
27 |
59 |
29 |
61 |
76 |
32 |
D+ |
Jeffrey Neal |
Sr. |
SG |
4 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
4 |
0 |
50 |
75 |
72 |
34 |
79 |
3 |
61 |
48 |
50 |
13 |
63 |
90 |
57 |
B- |
Kenneth Moore |
So. |
SG |
4 |
10 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
61 |
72 |
64 |
2 |
62 |
2 |
11 |
64 |
46 |
44 |
46 |
85 |
55 |
B |
Erwin Manders |
So. |
PF |
10 |
10 |
13 |
13 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
15 |
96 |
57 |
39 |
49 |
58 |
13 |
55 |
36 |
32 |
12 |
87 |
70 |
66 |
D+ |
David Allen |
Sr. |
C |
7 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
-2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
33 |
45 |
16 |
94 |
38 |
91 |
58 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
52 |
67 |
78 |
C+ |
Steven Daniels |
So. |
C |
0 |
4 |
12 |
11 |
8 |
7 |
1 |
-3 |
-1 |
3 |
10 |
9 |
61 |
66 |
18 |
66 |
61 |
56 |
54 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
39 |
63 |
59 |
C |
Robert Houtz |
So. |
C |
11 |
1 |
7 |
13 |
2 |
11 |
-1 |
-1 |
0 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
59 |
68 |
4 |
71 |
68 |
64 |
45 |
9 |
13 |
13 |
42 |
74 |
20 |
C |
Michael Woods |
Fr. |
SF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
19 |
14 |
6 |
9 |
29 |
9 |
1 |
6 |
70 |
80 |
56 |
D- |
Kenneth Doyle |
Fr. |
PF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
15 |
33 |
6 |
17 |
16 |
18 |
6 |
12 |
90 |
82 |
83 |
C |
14-6, RPI 18. Split against CUA in conference. The sophomore class is nice; Leary's going to have a chance to be someone who catches on Fire, even without the help of a clumsy cow and the bigs all have nice ATH/REBDEF upsides. I don't know if any get to 70 LP which limits the upside. The FR G's look decent, particularly Moody who will have a series of Not Bummer Winters at Salisbury; he's headed for Neal's profile with a little less D.
Gallaudet
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
Patrick Uribe |
Sr. |
PG |
2 |
-1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
12 |
53 |
53 |
64 |
1 |
64 |
2 |
37 |
81 |
91 |
65 |
59 |
83 |
97 |
B+ |
Thomas George |
Jr. |
PG |
8 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
5 |
60 |
56 |
80 |
1 |
55 |
4 |
1 |
81 |
87 |
70 |
57 |
70 |
72 |
C- |
Christopher Madsen |
Jr. |
PG |
8 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
2 |
34 |
58 |
72 |
2 |
59 |
2 |
15 |
31 |
61 |
46 |
30 |
68 |
91 |
C+ |
Harold Armstrong |
Jr. |
SG |
-1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
9 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
57 |
49 |
62 |
15 |
55 |
10 |
13 |
76 |
72 |
64 |
36 |
77 |
70 |
C- |
Richard Salesky |
Jr. |
SF |
0 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
8 |
48 |
54 |
65 |
44 |
58 |
28 |
52 |
38 |
37 |
40 |
66 |
82 |
49 |
B- |
Rob Stewart |
So. |
SF |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
29 |
44 |
59 |
24 |
47 |
14 |
26 |
39 |
44 |
39 |
30 |
67 |
40 |
D+ |
Sylvester Clark |
Fr. |
SF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
38 |
36 |
44 |
25 |
25 |
16 |
24 |
31 |
28 |
69 |
53 |
C- |
Samuel Boles |
So. |
PF |
4 |
3 |
10 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
51 |
54 |
43 |
79 |
77 |
43 |
30 |
12 |
39 |
34 |
47 |
81 |
31 |
C+ |
Brian Francis |
So. |
PF |
3 |
3 |
13 |
12 |
4 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
71 |
66 |
27 |
77 |
66 |
56 |
41 |
17 |
24 |
29 |
48 |
74 |
29 |
C- |
John Maynard |
Fr. |
PF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45 |
26 |
55 |
41 |
35 |
66 |
17 |
22 |
1 |
70 |
75 |
16 |
C |
Mark Guthrie |
So. |
C |
3 |
2 |
14 |
3 |
11 |
18 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
67 |
45 |
17 |
74 |
40 |
73 |
64 |
2 |
15 |
28 |
59 |
63 |
43 |
C- |
James Orlowsky |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
17 |
60 |
48 |
63 |
21 |
5 |
17 |
13 |
30 |
71 |
31 |
C+ |
16-5, RPI 13. Junior-laden squad poised for a decent run this year and a monster run next year. Check out the rebounding and LP improvements for the Sophomore bigs. Easy to project them to a nice place by next year's tourney. You thought you saw some ok improvements from FR SF Sylvester? You did, you did, you did. The improvements are not through the roof, but are broadbased and supressed by a 28 WE. Once that gets to the mid-30's, he should really take off. Edelman demands Maynard improve, his high potential in REB, DEF (+9), and LP (+8) fills a Supply. Orlowsky's improvements are much lower; that Edelman opted for him over a class-balancing G speaks to how bad the G prospects were this year.
Goucher
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
Hunter Hazley |
Sr. |
PG |
4 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
29 |
41 |
99 |
12 |
33 |
3 |
24 |
80 |
63 |
62 |
75 |
82 |
88 |
B+ |
Harry Valentine |
Sr. |
PG |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
-2 |
1 |
24 |
39 |
79 |
6 |
45 |
5 |
40 |
45 |
78 |
79 |
44 |
75 |
51 |
B- |
John Robinson |
Fr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
66 |
1 |
26 |
1 |
14 |
63 |
42 |
30 |
49 |
78 |
71 |
C |
Paul Monico |
So. |
SG |
0 |
1 |
-1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
-1 |
6 |
14 |
19 |
51 |
14 |
17 |
17 |
19 |
72 |
47 |
45 |
34 |
70 |
26 |
C |
John Helfenstein |
Fr. |
SG |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
35 |
27 |
52 |
2 |
35 |
2 |
35 |
48 |
41 |
36 |
35 |
71 |
69 |
D |
Andrew Faris |
Jr. |
SF |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
33 |
58 |
37 |
33 |
49 |
27 |
44 |
24 |
56 |
40 |
30 |
65 |
62 |
C+ |
John Patrick |
Jr. |
SF |
0 |
2 |
-1 |
4 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
-2 |
3 |
24 |
56 |
28 |
20 |
52 |
31 |
42 |
53 |
20 |
23 |
37 |
65 |
90 |
B- |
Matthew Sewell |
So. |
PF |
8 |
6 |
10 |
11 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
54 |
52 |
39 |
83 |
66 |
61 |
42 |
15 |
26 |
10 |
67 |
79 |
23 |
C |
Keith Foreman |
Sr. |
C |
5 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
-1 |
0 |
26 |
58 |
3 |
97 |
59 |
92 |
62 |
1 |
7 |
4 |
58 |
73 |
79 |
C- |
Brad Morrow |
Sr. |
C |
1 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
-1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
40 |
42 |
28 |
85 |
30 |
82 |
89 |
1 |
5 |
24 |
36 |
82 |
35 |
C+ |
Allen Bryant |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
10 |
60 |
24 |
59 |
31 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
26 |
63 |
67 |
D |
Jordan Vuong |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45 |
21 |
64 |
23 |
55 |
14 |
15 |
20 |
31 |
42 |
73 |
60 |
C- |
10-10, RPI 75 (same RPI as at the improvement summary last year). Only a win over Gallaudet in conference. Hazley's 99 SPD and Foreman's 97 REB will leave a gap, particularly in the G stable where the best returning ATH is 27, the best returning P is 45. Helfenstein is +3 in SPD, DEF, LP, and PE. With 35 WE, I don't know how high any of those will go. The bigs I really like. Bryant is obviously high-high LP (+7) which is needed to pair with Vuongs 14/+1 but high speed, REB, and DEF. With decent starting places in ATH, you have a pair that can compete; they might not be as good as the real Jordan and Bryant, but oh well.