South Summaries, Part II
VJ-RIP
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
David Peck |
Jr. |
PG |
0 |
8 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
13 |
15 |
8 |
9 |
3 |
83 |
30 |
78 |
7 |
45 |
8 |
18 |
75 |
75 |
71 |
69 |
76 |
52 |
C- |
John Brooks |
Fr. |
PG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
67 |
1 |
13 |
1 |
6 |
36 |
62 |
38 |
47 |
71 |
54 |
C+ |
Austin McVay |
Jr. |
SG |
1 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
12 |
0 |
13 |
9 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
11 |
78 |
23 |
60 |
44 |
25 |
28 |
2 |
72 |
70 |
60 |
70 |
84 |
40 |
C- |
Paul Suszynski |
Jr. |
SG |
5 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
14 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
0 |
71 |
52 |
61 |
30 |
50 |
19 |
62 |
37 |
64 |
48 |
53 |
86 |
71 |
B+ |
Joseph Fort |
Jr. |
SF |
2 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
10 |
1 |
25 |
3 |
11 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
98 |
18 |
64 |
52 |
31 |
37 |
43 |
76 |
33 |
67 |
88 |
83 |
59 |
C+ |
Charles Duffy |
Fr. |
SF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
37 |
25 |
31 |
11 |
60 |
29 |
34 |
11 |
41 |
58 |
68 |
D |
Lamont Jones |
Jr. |
PF |
6 |
3 |
-1 |
10 |
5 |
19 |
12 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
82 |
52 |
50 |
54 |
64 |
56 |
72 |
42 |
41 |
34 |
45 |
67 |
38 |
C |
Gordon Erickson |
Fr. |
PF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
25 |
38 |
36 |
19 |
47 |
32 |
25 |
9 |
39 |
70 |
73 |
C |
John Ware |
Fr. |
PF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
22 |
52 |
39 |
43 |
46 |
1 |
15 |
14 |
69 |
60 |
52 |
C |
Peter Penick |
Sr. |
C |
5 |
3 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
-2 |
2 |
-1 |
9 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
21 |
20 |
46 |
96 |
1 |
85 |
46 |
3 |
23 |
23 |
28 |
71 |
99 |
B- |
Bernard Rogers |
Sr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
22 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
55 |
33 |
38 |
99 |
29 |
76 |
74 |
26 |
28 |
2 |
83 |
93 |
99 |
C |
Marty Taylor |
Sr. |
C |
5 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
51 |
49 |
28 |
75 |
50 |
75 |
98 |
30 |
23 |
19 |
78 |
81 |
30 |
B- |
11-10, RPI 15. Interesting team. The 3 SR bigs are all have elite skills and with the interesting JR Jones make a formidable big rotation. Fort is really good and heading to an overall 700 rating as a SR. Peck almost looks like a pre-potential G for his well rounded skills. McVay is another NT quality G with a huge REB dividend. Definitely an NT capable team, though one that might be the first top-20 RPI team not to qualify. The two SimAI noncon losses are inexplicable and has left a mark. The future is interesting since he's returning all but the 3 big bigs, but they represent all his 55+ REB. Maybe the REB from the G's help make up for that, but there isn't enough ATH, I don't think, to be as good until some more REB enters the reservation. The FR don't overwhelm; I like Brooks as the right piece of "help now" 4th G with some G skill upside. The Duffman (Oh Yeah!) seems like a decent low-level, well-rounded SF (like my Franklyn German) with the advantage of a monster LP rating. Ware is the big with the skills to make VJ-RIP Ware's house with high LP and REB potential. Meanwhile, his frontcourt mate will likely wear out his welcome, with a low REB/ATH combo and not much improvement so far this year.
The Hood
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
Ronald Smith |
Sr. |
PG |
0 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
4 |
8 |
49 |
38 |
87 |
2 |
46 |
4 |
22 |
97 |
86 |
53 |
43 |
86 |
72 |
B |
Daniel Gill |
Jr. |
PG |
5 |
4 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
6 |
11 |
2 |
13 |
16 |
83 |
54 |
75 |
8 |
46 |
10 |
42 |
54 |
75 |
58 |
60 |
73 |
74 |
B |
Timothy Billington |
Sr. |
SG |
4 |
8 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
42 |
66 |
74 |
1 |
77 |
5 |
7 |
82 |
59 |
69 |
60 |
79 |
48 |
C- |
Donald Benites |
So. |
SG |
7 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
2 |
53 |
55 |
75 |
23 |
47 |
14 |
9 |
62 |
60 |
57 |
33 |
67 |
10 |
C- |
Christopher Lavender |
So. |
SF |
5 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
11 |
61 |
51 |
44 |
15 |
63 |
3 |
37 |
59 |
39 |
34 |
43 |
59 |
82 |
B- |
Michael Smith |
Fr. |
SF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
34 |
32 |
54 |
5 |
47 |
8 |
23 |
37 |
63 |
71 |
71 |
C |
Robert Ewing |
Sr. |
PF |
5 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
10 |
-2 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
58 |
73 |
23 |
78 |
57 |
62 |
90 |
17 |
7 |
18 |
45 |
79 |
44 |
C+ |
Joseph Ohler |
Jr. |
PF |
0 |
14 |
3 |
15 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
60 |
59 |
19 |
74 |
94 |
60 |
96 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
70 |
80 |
41 |
B- |
Walter Clark |
So. |
C |
5 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
12 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
17 |
74 |
59 |
14 |
63 |
44 |
65 |
67 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
56 |
66 |
54 |
C+ |
Grady Murakami |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
19 |
71 |
21 |
63 |
48 |
1 |
37 |
38 |
20 |
61 |
73 |
D |
John Stephens |
Fr. |
C |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
28 |
65 |
29 |
61 |
34 |
32 |
31 |
14 |
54 |
55 |
13 |
D+ |
Kenneth Fleming |
Fr. |
PF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
14 |
26 |
30 |
24 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
95 |
67 |
38 |
D+ |
11-9, RPI 23. This is the borderline W team most likely to get to the magic 14 wins. Hood still has the horses to make a run in the dance due to mad PE/LP skills and enough DE/SPD/ATH to force 20+ Tos a game and hold their own on the boards despite mid-level rebounding. The pieces are there to simply reload next year, though the team's top PEs will be low enough to cramp eyetest's style. Note the Nogglian improvement by Mr Smith Goes to Fredrick. No ATH/REB upside, but a high enough starting point in both to put a 750 OVR rating in the realm of possibility. THe FR bigs very good, but there is no future Harrison in the crowd. Stephens' LP improvement is particularly notable, another case of a low starting point "Sky's the limit" report paying off quickly.
Saint Marys of Maryland
|
|
|
Improvement |
Current Status |
Name |
Yr. |
Pos. |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
TOT |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
Craig Ford |
Sr. |
PG |
0 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
-1 |
1 |
43 |
36 |
81 |
1 |
57 |
5 |
1 |
72 |
84 |
75 |
55 |
78 |
59 |
A- |
Marc Morrow |
So. |
PG |
2 |
5 |
-2 |
7 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
9 |
11 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
53 |
36 |
66 |
4 |
29 |
10 |
11 |
66 |
70 |
65 |
41 |
75 |
44 |
C |
Freddie Switzer |
Sr. |
SG |
0 |
2 |
11 |
2 |
4 |
-1 |
6 |
5 |
14 |
10 |
6 |
-1 |
58 |
39 |
68 |
18 |
51 |
8 |
4 |
97 |
61 |
69 |
62 |
88 |
77 |
B |
Roy Legere |
Jr. |
SG |
9 |
4 |
-1 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
13 |
3 |
-1 |
4 |
11 |
0 |
53 |
52 |
64 |
7 |
55 |
8 |
33 |
87 |
59 |
51 |
45 |
78 |
34 |
B- |
Rufus McAlarney |
Fr. |
SG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
52 |
5 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
51 |
48 |
28 |
68 |
70 |
63 |
C+ |
James Battle |
Sr. |
SF |
7 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
22 |
-1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
58 |
50 |
49 |
79 |
37 |
54 |
68 |
53 |
28 |
19 |
50 |
74 |
80 |
B |
Andrew Cabe |
So. |
SF |
9 |
7 |
11 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
11 |
58 |
38 |
41 |
43 |
26 |
22 |
8 |
46 |
55 |
43 |
48 |
71 |
47 |
C |
Dana Blaine |
Jr. |
PF |
7 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
11 |
21 |
0 |
-3 |
-1 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
67 |
32 |
46 |
72 |
23 |
60 |
61 |
7 |
27 |
36 |
50 |
67 |
97 |
B- |
Kim Simpson |
Sr. |
C |
0 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
8 |
4 |
11 |
64 |
41 |
38 |
86 |
55 |
71 |
93 |
1 |
25 |
10 |
75 |
73 |
53 |
A- |
Gary Goulette |
Jr. |
C |
12 |
9 |
4 |
10 |
4 |
16 |
5 |
-1 |
0 |
9 |
11 |
12 |
91 |
39 |
31 |
89 |
37 |
73 |
59 |
12 |
23 |
27 |
52 |
70 |
86 |
B- |
Alfred Lilly |
So. |
C |
1 |
3 |
10 |
6 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
-2 |
14 |
49 |
35 |
4 |
86 |
34 |
81 |
39 |
2 |
1 |
26 |
45 |
70 |
79 |
C |
Michael Nelson |
So. |
C |
3 |
6 |
12 |
2 |
10 |
22 |
0 |
-1 |
1 |
-3 |
11 |
12 |
75 |
28 |
11 |
84 |
24 |
79 |
63 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
60 |
72 |
70 |
C |
19-2, RPI 22, ranked #6. Odd scheduling (3 noncon games vs 320+ RPI teams) leave this team underrated by RPI. The starting 5 is solid (Goulette is the weakest link by more than a close shave; he's not the best a man can get), driven by the 4 SRs who are all among the elite at their positions. The future is in reasonably good hands though the drop off from Simpson and Battle will be enough that the good season vindication will drop from a final 4 run to a S16 one. The only FR is weak on D, but should end up with 65-70 on SPD/PE/BH with a little upside beyond that from a monster WE and a RS season.