ESPN HOF ballot revealed. Topic

MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
A well-deserved non-election.   He doesn't get better as time moves forward. 
1/7/2014 4:05 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
burnsy483
Posts: 6848 (0)
Veteran
1 1 26
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 1/7/2014 4:05:00 PM (view original):
A well-deserved non-election.   He doesn't get better as time moves forward. 
You're right, he just remains HOF-worthy.
1/7/2014 4:17 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect

For those with lower HOF standards, sure.   

1/7/2014 4:19 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
There are 20 LF in the Hall of Fame. Raines was better than all but 5 of them.

Admitting him to the Hall raises the standard for left fielders.
1/7/2014 7:10 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Yeah, "He's as good as...." doesn't work for me.    Probably said that quite a few times.
1/7/2014 7:51 PM
masterdebate
Posts: 4619 (2)
Hall of Famer
290 153 1 1
Rookie
Ken Gurick didn't vote for anyone from the steroid era. Only player he voted for was Morris.
1/7/2014 8:48 PM
Jtpsops
Posts: 15882 (3)
Hall of Famer
772 1 2 2 146
Prospect
Let's remember, Mike was the one who once upon a time suggested a HOF of 25 hitters and 25 pitchers, and if you wanted to add someone new, you had to remove an existing member to keep it at 50.

It's like a school requiring a 4.0 GPA to make the Honour Roll.
1/7/2014 8:53 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 1/7/2014 7:51:00 PM (view original):
Yeah, "He's as good as...." doesn't work for me.    Probably said that quite a few times.
I know you've said that. And if the argument for Raines was, "he was only better than Rice," I'd agree with you.

But he was better than 75% of the left fielders already in the hall. That's way past borderline, that's a slam dunk.
1/7/2014 8:58 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18997 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 166 32 129
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 1/7/2014 7:10:00 PM (view original):
There are 20 LF in the Hall of Fame. Raines was better than all but 5 of them.

Admitting him to the Hall raises the standard for left fielders.
I'm curious.  Who are the "only 5" LFers in the HOF you would put ahead of Raines?
1/7/2014 9:07 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by bad_luck on 1/7/2014 8:58:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 1/7/2014 7:51:00 PM (view original):
Yeah, "He's as good as...." doesn't work for me.    Probably said that quite a few times.
I know you've said that. And if the argument for Raines was, "he was only better than Rice," I'd agree with you.

But he was better than 75% of the left fielders already in the hall. That's way past borderline, that's a slam dunk.
Maybe there should only be 5. 
1/7/2014 9:11 PM
bad_luck
Posts: 21761 (0)
Hall of Famer
48 1 10
Prospect
Posted by tecwrg on 1/7/2014 9:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/7/2014 7:10:00 PM (view original):
There are 20 LF in the Hall of Fame. Raines was better than all but 5 of them.

Admitting him to the Hall raises the standard for left fielders.
I'm curious.  Who are the "only 5" LFers in the HOF you would put ahead of Raines?
It's really only 4 already in. I counted Bonds as already too.

Bonds
Williams
Henderson
Yaz
Simmons

Do you see any other Hall of a Fame left fielders better than Raines?
1/7/2014 10:03 PM
masterdebate
Posts: 4619 (2)
Hall of Famer
290 153 1 1
Rookie
Musial off the top of my head.
1/7/2014 10:12 PM
tecwrg
Posts: 18997 (0)
Hall of Famer
4 1 166 32 129
Prospect
Willie Stargell.

Billy Williams.

Ralph Kiner.
1/7/2014 10:22 PM
Jtpsops
Posts: 15882 (3)
Hall of Famer
772 1 2 2 146
Prospect
Brock, Delahanty, Yaz
1/7/2014 10:22 PM
◂ Prev 1...6|7|8|9|10...34 Next ▸
ESPN HOF ballot revealed. Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.