Posted by MikeT23 on 2/23/2012 10:03:00 AM (view original):
From fangraphs:
- FIP does a better job of predicting the future than of measuring the present, meaning there can be a lot of fluctuation in smaller samples. It’s not a great choice when trying to describe how a pitcher performed during a single game.
You left out this part:
"Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP) measures what a player’s ERA should have looked like over a give time period, assuming that performance on balls in play and timing were league average. Back in the early 2000s, research by Voros McCracken revealed that the amount of balls that fall in for hits against pitchers do not correlate well across seasons. In other words, pitchers have little control over balls in play, so a better way to assess a pitcher’s talent level is by looking at things a pitcher can control: strikeouts, walks, hit by pitches, and homeruns.
Obviously, a walk is not as hurtful as a homerun and a strikeout has less impact than both. FIP accounts for these differences, and presents results on the same scale as ERA. It has been proven to be much more effective than ERA at predicting future performance, and has become a mainstay in sabermetric analysis."
It's a record of what happened. It's not a predictive stat but is more effective at predicting the future than ERA.