Posted by tecwrg on 2/23/2012 10:35:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 2/23/2012 10:33:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/23/2012 10:31:00 AM (view original):
I'll rephrase. FIP pretends that every struck ball that doesn't clear the fence is the same. Watch a game. They aren't.
For a reason. The pitcher doesn't control whether or not a ball in play becomes a hit.
Can a pitcher have any influence on how well struck a ball in play was hit?
This, to me, is my issue with FIP and the whole BABIP thing. I've seen enough with BABIP to basically buy into the idea that pitchers don't have as much control over it as I think it seems like they should. If a guy like Roy Halladay can't consistently stay under .300 BABIP with how much he moves and commands the ball, then I'm really not sure who could control that. That being said, Halladay has been consistently outperforming his FIP for 6 years, despite being right around league average in BABIP. Since it's been years since people considered BA the sole measure of offensive capability, I'm not sure why the discussion stops at BABIP relative to how much control a pitcher has over the results of balls in play. FIP gets at OBP by including walk rate, but misses a big part of slugging since it only deals with HRs. If Halladay's not letting anyone square him up, he might not see a consistent BABIP drop because a lot of those weak grounders and bloops can wind up as hits depending on where they go - but there's a hell of a lot less chance of those plays turning into 2B and 3B, no matter the defense behind them.