Posted by jrd_x on 6/14/2012 5:20:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/14/2012 3:39:00 PM (view original):
Again, it's just how one recognizes the position a player played. A-Rod will be wearing a Yankee hat in the HOF. He played 3B for the Yankees.
Guys like Yount and Banks are a little tougher because they played their entire careers with one team. Killebrew would be impossible, IMO.
When you are talking about classifying a player at a position, what team he played for is irrelevant. I actually agree with you on Arod. I don't think he should count as a shortstop. But I also don't think Banks (or Yount) should count as a shortstop, at least not in the "here's a list of the greatest shortstops of all time" sense.
Given that Yount played 329 more games at shortstop than at center field, and was at his best there, his position is best classified as shortstop. He is also obviously one of the all-time greats to fit as a shortstop. So which is true?
1. You acknowledge Yount is best placed at shortstop, but eliminate him from consideration because he played just under 55% of his games at short.
2. You classify Yount as a shortstop, but use only what he accomplished when his primary position was shortstop when ranking him.
The first means that no matter how deep you might take a shortstops ranking, Yount would not appear there. Because it is the only logical place he could be ranked, it would be as though he never played in the big leagues. The second eliminates enough of his accomplishments to take him out a top 10 ranking, and probably top 20.