© Bears 2011 Thread Topic

Maybe your words would have more effect if you weren't such a condescending ***** all the time (and you can stop sitemailing me too, chief).

Anyway, we'll find out how good the Bears defense really is in the coming weeks when they're required to start winning games on their own again.
11/22/2011 2:35 PM
Tebow was finally allowed to play.  And he beat the Jets.  My guess, if given free rein, he'd have ran for 100 and thrown for 200 against the Jets.   Saying he "solved" them isn't technically correct.  He was just allowed to beat them when Fox finally let him go.
11/22/2011 2:44 PM
In truth, I think Elway's comment yesterday tells us what we need to know about Fox/Elway/Tebow.   Fox and Elway aren't protecting him from himself, they are setting him up for failure. 
11/22/2011 2:45 PM
Uh oh...don't tell muddy, but Mr. Urlacher thinks the Bears should run a certain "***** high school offense".

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d824562c2/article/bears-urlacher-selling-tebow-time-but-lovie-isnt-buying?module=HP11_hot_topics
11/22/2011 4:20 PM
Posted by The Taint on 11/22/2011 11:02:00 AM (view original):
Posted by mudbone1969 on 11/21/2011 7:11:00 PM (view original):
I love when JTard starts making predictions.  He's always been so spot-on.
Next thing you know, he'll be throwing out stupid **** like, "I'll bet the average completion percentage in the NFL is around 45-50 percent." 
Now you're just being mean.
11/22/2011 4:36 PM
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/21/2011 11:27:00 PM (view original):
And randl...err, muddy strikes again with another 3 post spree. 

As I recall, I predicted a bad finish for the Bears - and voila, Cutler goes down.  I may target the Pats and Brady next, haven't decided yet.
Forgive me for answering posts separately.  randletard just babbles inane **** when he spree-posts.
11/22/2011 4:36 PM
Posted by Jtpsops on 11/22/2011 4:20:00 PM (view original):
Uh oh...don't tell muddy, but Mr. Urlacher thinks the Bears should run a certain "***** high school offense".

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d824562c2/article/bears-urlacher-selling-tebow-time-but-lovie-isnt-buying?module=HP11_hot_topics
He said nothing of the sort, but thanks anyway.
11/22/2011 4:39 PM

Enlighten us as to what "Tebow offense" refers to.

Unless of course you just don't want to think of your Bears running such an atrocious scheme

11/22/2011 4:41 PM
I'd rather join you in fellating Teblow than watch my Bears run the option as their primary offense.  I think Urlacher meant he'd like to see Hanie run a bit, not run that offense all the time.
11/22/2011 5:03 PM
There's a big difference between "I hope we can help him move around outside the pocket, maybe run a bit" and "perhaps we should run the Tebow offense"
11/22/2011 5:12 PM
Urlacher is not known as the brightest bulb in the box.  He's kind of like you, in that respect.
11/22/2011 5:16 PM
11/22/2011 10:29 PM
Josh McCown, come on down!!!

Ugh.  But he's a better choice than Favre.
11/23/2011 5:58 PM
If Paris Hilton had gotten knocked up by Urlacher, how dumb would the babies have been?
11/23/2011 6:21 PM
Paris Hilton + Urlacher = J.Cutler   or if  they both smoked crack during pregnancy =  Jimbo
11/25/2011 11:26 PM
◂ Prev 1...11|12|13|14|15...34 Next ▸
© Bears 2011 Thread Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.