Posted by SAKABAKBRG on 3/23/2011 9:50:00 PM (view original):
Mark Recchi thinks the Habs embellished Pacioretty's injury to try to get Chara suspended:
"He does obviously have a fractured vertebra, but the concussion is obviously really a non-factor," said Recchi, citing how Pacioretty attended a movie several days after the hit. "In maybe a day or two -- maybe a day he felt it -- but he was fine a couple days later. They were trying to get Zdeno suspended and they embellished it a little bit. In terms of that side, they're doing whatever they could to get him suspended. I think the league sent a message that it was a hockey play. That's the important thing and people have to understand. If they deemed it something that was serious, they suspended Matt Cooke up to 17 games for a head shot. They're serious about protecting the players now. That was an interference play at worst. The partitions got in the way. I don't think Zdeno is to blame for that."
Well if Mark Recchi, a teammate of Zdeno Chara, said it, it must be true! I wanna know where raucous is...he was quick to criticize Lemieux for not doing anything to Matt Cooke for a dangerous hit, and yet here is a teammate, let alone an owner of the team, saying that he thinks it was both intereference AND a hockey play. If it's a penalty to begin with, it's illegal in the game of hockey. How is it a "hockey play"? Anyone have any sound bites of what Recchi said about the Cooke on Savard hit?
This is a very transparent and obvious ploy by Recchi to get his team and fans riled up for the next meeting between the teams and you're buying it hook, line and sinker, SAK.