Posted by logain on 8/23/2011 12:57:00 PM (view original):
In my mind when I am evaluating say Kevin Durant. That team has Durant on it for 4 years and then doesn't have durant for the rest of whatever time I'm considering (which for me I think is around 8 years). The rest of the time I have to weigh that team with Robert Horry starting at the 3. 1 of those season's of Durant's is his pretty bad shooting rookie year. So, those 3 years of Durant/MJ that team is a title favorite to me. The rest of the time they may still be contendors as Horry was very solid but I have to weigh them differently (and see the last pick).
Similarly, when I evaluate Walton over such a period I have a couple years in the high 20s, a few years at 18 minutes or so, and probably a missed season for injury or protest. So, those two higher minute Walton seasons the team is more of a contender than the years that Nance is starting at PF with Walton playing off the bench.
I think how people judge this is going to be subjective and different. Our only instructions are to weigh prime and longevity and possibly to consider a 5-10 year window.
Also Horry was a better PF than SF as he wasn't quick enough to defend most SF's especially after the hip injury. The SF's in this league would take advantage of Horry! He would have his hands full with the PF's in this league also. Horry was an avg regular season player at best but was a clutch post season player.
Dream was the great protector!
Rodman could play the 3's defensively but they seriously lack offense with Horry & Rodman on the floor at the same time. Neither can get their own shot or create for others especially when the shot clock is tickin down. Horry was an excellent wing passer to the post standing still though, just ask Dream! His entry pass was as good as any!
Horry & Rodman are both my boys though! High energy/hustle and great toughness for these skinny boys. They get in ur heads like Laimbeer, & Mahorn taught Rodman to do! Head Games!
8/23/2011 2:36 PM (edited)