First of all, let me start off by once again thanking gumbercules for doing an incredible job of streamlining this lunacy. This has gone even better than I envisioned it, thanks in no small part to GQ's hard work. It's like I stranded men on second and third with one out, and he bailed me out with a two-out, two-run double to take the lead. Way to pick me up kid!
Regarding the helmethead situation, I say we start looking for an alternate now. Hopefully the owner who signed up one spot too late still wants to jump in. The good news is that the new owner will not be at a disadvantage, seeing as how there are still several owners in the same boat with a number of quality Units yet to be opened.
I want to discuss an idea that I came up with. I know that changing the rules midway through the start of a progressive is usually a big no-no, but I don't see how this affects anyone negatively. My idea involves the way the Rookie Auctions will work. I think the Unit Auctions are one of the things that makes this league original and presents a new type of challenge. I'd like to keep the spirit of the Unit Auctions intact as we go forward.
As of right now, all Rookies are slated to be auctioned off individually, followed by an open auction on all remaining players (non-keepers, players on IR for 2000, and undrafted players). I want to change it to the following:
Following the completion of the 2000 season, owners will post their keeper lists the same way (no max, 1 Million per keeper for the first 20, 3 Million for every additional keeper)
After that, ALL remaining players in the 2001 WIS database (incoming rookies, non-keepers, un-drafted players from 2000, and un-drafted players who were on IR) will be divided into 60 Player Units depending on their real life 2001 MLB team, Each MLB team would have a Hitters Unit and a Pitchers Unit that would be available for bidding. Still sorting out the details in my head, but what do you guys think?