F*ck Draft V.2.0 Convo Thread Topic

Site-Mail sent, Time for a vote on P.O.H.
1/19/2011 2:01 PM
Posted by rydart25 on 1/19/2011 12:25:00 PM (view original):
I'm cool with what ever it was just a thought saving it for the last. I've been going back and forth on if I'm even going to use one.
Same here. Not even sure if I'm picking one either. Which is why I'd be okay with waiting until round 12.
1/19/2011 2:13 PM
My problem is the only one I'm considering could still be considered hot and was taken in the last **** draft, but she used to be hotter.
1/19/2011 2:24 PM
Posted by thejuice6 on 1/19/2011 1:55:00 PM (view original):
GIN - nice pick in the draft!

thanks...was thinking of holding off til second round but i HAD to have her and didn't wanna take a chance. I LOVE'S the Selma!!!!

1/19/2011 3:04 PM
Considering hockey hasn't even heard of half the girls picked so far. I'm predicting he makes one of the worst picks of the 1st round next.
1/19/2011 4:39 PM
Maybe. 
1/19/2011 4:56 PM
Of course, one would be hard pressed to top the massive reach that Swamp made with Katy Perry.
1/19/2011 4:59 PM
I'm thinking anytime during the 10-12 rounds should be good for the POH.  That way you need to put a little more thought into when you should take her.
I think it might be more important to decide the difference between a Current pick and a POH pick. 
By that I mean, are we looking at the last year or two only?  Or would a chick from 5 years ago still be current?
Obviously anyone with life and look altering situations would have to be considered as of after the event.
Example - Nikki Cox.   Even 4 years ago she was still hot, but then the horrific plastic surgery accident happened. 

But what about someone who just sort of fell off the grid over the last 3 years?
1/19/2011 5:14 PM
I think it should be whenever you want. If you pick the HOFer early, you probably get the one you want. The downside is you will lose one of your higher regular picks. Let 'er loose after round one.
1/19/2011 5:40 PM
Sitemail sent to utah, but I don't mind posting here too. I think it should not be restricted at all. Someone in their 40's (like me) would have more draftees in mind than someone in their 20's. Why should I be restricted because my pick was hot in my 20's that someone who is in their 20's now thinks is past their prime, or doesn't even know the person I picked?

 I read the 'POH' section as you could use it in the 12th round if you wanted to. I didn't read it that you couldn't use a 'POH' in any round. Wouldn't that open up a major difference of opinion of when anybody's point of hotness was? 

Having said that, if the rules are changed to certain 'POH' round(s), I have no problem going with the majority as long as I know ahead of time.

EDIT - Having read page 10 of the draft, do we really now have to start proving what month/year a photo was taken?

1/19/2011 6:14 PM (edited)
Posted by marloweou812 on 1/19/2011 6:14:00 PM (view original):
Sitemail sent to utah, but I don't mind posting here too. I think it should not be restricted at all. Someone in their 40's (like me) would have more draftees in mind than someone in their 20's. Why should I be restricted because my pick was hot in my 20's that someone who is in their 20's now thinks is past their prime, or doesn't even know the person I picked?

 I read the 'POH' section as you could use it in the 12th round if you wanted to. I didn't read it that you couldn't use a 'POH' in any round. Wouldn't that open up a major difference of opinion of when anybody's point of hotness was? 

Having said that, if the rules are changed to certain 'POH' round(s), I have no problem going with the majority as long as I know ahead of time.

EDIT - Having read page 10 of the draft, do we really now have to start proving what month/year a photo was taken?

Wait, I'm confused now.

Lets start with the EDIT.  The month/year was posted with those pics in response to the any recent pics question.  Your pictures were 20 years old, which led us to believe that it was a POH pick. 

Now lets go back to your interpretation of the POH section.  You read it as you could use it in the 12th Round.  But that didn't give you the impression that you could ONLY use it in the 12th Round?  I didn't think it was that confusing.
We started with "after the 3rd round" and then changed it to you can use one in the 12th Round if you want, but you don't have to make one.
I don't understand.

Now to the top.  This appears to be the biggest difference between this draft and the original.  The first time around we allowed the field to be wide open, as long as she was still alive, you could draft her at her "Peak of Hotness".  This draft appears to be aimed at current levels of hotness, with one exception that can be taken (as of now) in the 12th Round (and only in the 12th round, if you want it). 

Maybe we should have a **** Draft Classic, where there is no rule on PoH, or age, or spotlight status.

By the way, I'm 36, and I'd still **** the **** outta Elle Macpherson, even if she is 47.  Although I'd have rather her from 1985-1991 where I really remember her, and when she was at the top of her game.

1/19/2011 6:29 PM
Posted by marloweou812 on 1/19/2011 6:14:00 PM (view original):
Sitemail sent to utah, but I don't mind posting here too. I think it should not be restricted at all. Someone in their 40's (like me) would have more draftees in mind than someone in their 20's. Why should I be restricted because my pick was hot in my 20's that someone who is in their 20's now thinks is past their prime, or doesn't even know the person I picked?

 I read the 'POH' section as you could use it in the 12th round if you wanted to. I didn't read it that you couldn't use a 'POH' in any round. Wouldn't that open up a major difference of opinion of when anybody's point of hotness was? 

Having said that, if the rules are changed to certain 'POH' round(s), I have no problem going with the majority as long as I know ahead of time.

EDIT - Having read page 10 of the draft, do we really now have to start proving what month/year a photo was taken?

To be honest I kinda take offence to the age thing. As a guy in his 20's age doesn't really matter to me if a chick is hot she's hot. For instance and this is not a dig at swamp I would **** the **** out of Lauren Graham before I ever looked Katy Perrys way.
1/19/2011 6:56 PM (edited)
I haven't read either of the threads except page one of the draft thread when the round one order was set until utah's email today. So I missed rules discussions, etc. I went based on what i read on page one. Sure, maybe I read it wrong. I was just stating my opinion as I saw it.

I am still willing to go with the majority on any changes as long as it is specific. So now is there a question of how old the pics can be if it's not a POH pick?
1/19/2011 6:53 PM
Posted by rydart25 on 1/19/2011 6:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by marloweou812 on 1/19/2011 6:14:00 PM (view original):
Sitemail sent to utah, but I don't mind posting here too. I think it should not be restricted at all. Someone in their 40's (like me) would have more draftees in mind than someone in their 20's. Why should I be restricted because my pick was hot in my 20's that someone who is in their 20's now thinks is past their prime, or doesn't even know the person I picked?

 I read the 'POH' section as you could use it in the 12th round if you wanted to. I didn't read it that you couldn't use a 'POH' in any round. Wouldn't that open up a major difference of opinion of when anybody's point of hotness was? 

Having said that, if the rules are changed to certain 'POH' round(s), I have no problem going with the majority as long as I know ahead of time.

EDIT - Having read page 10 of the draft, do we really now have to start proving what month/year a photo was taken?

To be honest I kinda take offence to the age thing. As a guy in his 20's age doesn't really matter to me if a chick is hot she's hot. For instance and this is not a dig at swamp I would **** the **** out of Lauren Graham before I ever looked Katy Perrys way.
Same here. I'm 26 and would prefer not to draft somebody older than 41 (as they'd be just about old enough to be my mother), but I'll make an exception if she's hot enough & Lauren Graham is hot enough.
1/19/2011 7:07 PM
Posted by marloweou812 on 1/19/2011 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I haven't read either of the threads except page one of the draft thread when the round one order was set until utah's email today. So I missed rules discussions, etc. I went based on what i read on page one. Sure, maybe I read it wrong. I was just stating my opinion as I saw it.

I am still willing to go with the majority on any changes as long as it is specific. So now is there a question of how old the pics can be if it's not a POH pick?
I don't think the age of the pics is really an issue, unless they are 10+ years old.

If I draft Diane Lane, I might throw up a pic from Perfect Storm, or definitely something more recent, but I wouldn't throw up a pic from The Outsiders.
1/19/2011 7:22 PM
◂ Prev 1...9|10|11|12|13...63 Next ▸
F*ck Draft V.2.0 Convo Thread Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.