4 more years of Obama.... Topic

6/26/2012 11:32 PM
Both options S*CK, along with the way our whole Democracy has been f'd-up to the point where our elected officials feel it's more important to vote along party lines (and keep their own campaign funds flowing in) than it is to vote for the people who actually voted them in and they are supposed to be representing.

That said, since Romney's record scares the sh!t out of me (as it should anyone who doesn't make multi-millions), I'll be voting for the lesser of 2 evils. 
6/27/2012 8:55 AM
NO MAGIC UNDERWEAR IN THE OVAL OFFICE
6/27/2012 3:55 PM (edited)
Vote for the one who already failed, or vote for the one who will probably fail.
Vote for the Socialist, or vote for the liberal.

How depressing.  I am voting for Romney and hope that the Tea Party congress people can get more people in.

Unfortunately, Hatch won last night. 
6/27/2012 10:53 AM
Quote post by occsid on 6/27/2012 9:25:00 AM:
          NO MAGIC UNDERWEAR IN THE OVAL OFFICE


FTFY
6/27/2012 11:05 AM
Posted by all3 on 6/27/2012 8:55:00 AM (view original):
Both options S*CK, along with the way our whole Democracy has been f'd-up to the point where our elected officials feel it's more important to vote along party lines (and keep their own campaign funds flowing in) than it is to vote for the people who actually voted them in and they are supposed to be representing.

That said, since Romney's record scares the sh!t out of me (as it should anyone who doesn't make multi-millions), I'll be voting for the lesser of 2 evils. 
1 If you think both options suck you cant be paying attention because these guys are very different from each other. For documentable proof I give SC nominees.

2 It isnt like each party has a guy in a room making up laws and forcing everyone to vote for them. They get together in groups and find laws that they think are good and submit them to committee and it goes up. Many people are part of the process so most party members support it. And with that many party members do not support their party on a given bill.

6/27/2012 11:36 AM


Tongue in cheek
6/27/2012 4:15 PM
6/27/2012 4:30 PM
Swamp, you have repeatedly shown you are absolutely clueless when it comes to politics (a view shared just about unanimously by other PITsters, based on their comments), so I'm not going to waste my time even trying to help you understand.
6/27/2012 5:26 PM
What you actually mean is I dont blindly follow a European stlye Socialism agenda. I dont accept that the last 50 years of Liberal polices are not the cause of our problems.

What about my good friend Doug, or Jclark or the other Cons in the pit.  


6/27/2012 6:15 PM
6/27/2012 7:58 PM
6/27/2012 7:59 PM
it's a free country

four more years of oblama means you won't have to show your papers to move from a to b
6/27/2012 8:25 PM
Actually 4 more years of Obama will mean that illegals can do anything they want. And you wont be able to afford papers because between all the new taxes and the fact that an illegal took your job you will be broke.
6/27/2012 8:31 PM
so you are all for showing papers to prove to the authorities you have the right to drive from a to b
6/27/2012 9:04 PM
12345 Next ▸
4 more years of Obama.... Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.