Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/1/2012 9:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by seamar_116 on 9/1/2012 6:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/1/2012 12:47:00 PM (view original):

Posted by seamar_116 on 9/1/2012 5:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/1/2012 4:04:00 AM (view original):
You are so pathetic.

Anyone reading my post with an impartial eye would see my point was valid.

We know you are, but what are we?

You effin get caught contradicting yourself. Why was Ann Romney looking the the mother of the bride suffering through a drunken toast by the crazy uncle?

It didnt contradict you moron.

The first point was Eastwood was great.

The second point is that you are so biased against Conservatives that no matter what he said you would think it was bad.

<<Posted by swamphawk22 on 8/31/2012 10:53:00 AM (view original):
The fact is Clint hit it out of the park>>

<<Quote post by swamphawk22 on 8/31/2012 10:22:00 PM:
And I believe that you all saw a bad performance.>>


"I believe that you all saw a bad performance"   This is what YOU SAID YOU BELIEVE...12 hours after you said "Clint hit it out of the park"

You are so conflicted by your obsessive need to defend everything anybody disagrees with against your obsessive need to believe everything you hear from the right...and when many on the right are shaking their heads over Mayor Eastwood's performance it's like matter and anti-matter have met in your brain.

I said you SAW a bad performance.

Not that he was bad, but that you SAW IT.

Is this really so hard for you guys to grasp?

"WHY DOESN'T ANYBODY UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN!?!?!"

-swamphawk yelling at a chair

It is a simple concept.

You are either stupid or just making trouble for a conservative.

I'll go with making trouble for a stupid conservative.

So there wasn't a bad performance, but we saw it? Like, I don't know, an IMAGINARY performance sitting in a chair?

Have you ever seen anyone more desperate to avoid admitting he was wrong? And you can tell how desperate, not just because of the ludicrous explanation, but by the condescension. As if that's supposed to distract us from the dumbassery. That **** doesn't work when jclark tries it; it sure as **** isn't going to work for the junior varsity.

Clint Eastwood did more than make headlines with his bizarre speech at the Republican National Convention -- he managed to make Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker cringe.

Walker called the speech "that one moment, which I cringed about" on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Friday. The GOP governor said he would have rather seen more of Romney's personal story

Are you calling Gov. Scott Walker stupid? How small is your little world of "true believers"?  And before you rail about MSNBC, Morning Joe, is Joe Scarborough, former Republican congressman from Florida.

<<I said you SAW a bad performance.

<<Not that he was bad, but that you SAW IT.

Is this really so hard for you guys to grasp?

"WHY DOESN'T ANYBODY UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN!?!?!">>

You said "You saw a BAD performance"   If it wasn't bad, why didn't you say "You saw a good performance"?  Do good and bad mean the same thing to you? I know that you feel like you can make up new "Socrates-like" meanings for words, but then you can't ***** when you use them in ways that the rest of the planet doesn't grok.

I saw a good performance.   Weird.   Unexpected.  Effective to the crowd.  Effective at poking a stick in lib's eyes.   Caused MSNBC to foam.    It was everything it needed to be.     Will be a good contrast to all the 'Paul Wellstone Funeral' behavior the DNC traveling salvation show will have.   Looking forward to the highlights.
(forgot to check my post for liberal racist dogwhistle words.  Is 'poking' some sort of I-want-all-the-blacks-to-die word? I haven't had time to keep up with all the code)

Am I a racist for wondering why the DNC is even holding their convention in a state who's flag incorporates parts of 2 confederate flags?

If you're that self conscious about racism in your posts.....there's a good chance you're a racist.

Just sayin'.

Posted by slowmoe on 9/2/2012 12:37:00 AM (view original):
I saw a good performance.   Weird.   Unexpected.  Effective to the crowd.  Effective at poking a stick in lib's eyes.   Caused MSNBC to foam.    It was everything it needed to be.     Will be a good contrast to all the 'Paul Wellstone Funeral' behavior the DNC traveling salvation show will have.   Looking forward to the highlights.
(forgot to check my post for liberal racist dogwhistle words.  Is 'poking' some sort of I-want-all-the-blacks-to-die word? I haven't had time to keep up with all the code)

Am I a racist for wondering why the DNC is even holding their convention in a state who's flag incorporates parts of 2 confederate flags?

yeah, you said you saw a "good performance." Fair enough. Beauty in the eye of the beholder and all that. I think "poke" and all its derivatives are dog-whistle free.

But I don't see you sticking up for Swamp who wants it both ways...as in "hit it out of the park" and "you saw a bad performance."

Why do I have to stick up for or agree with anyone?  Are you painting with the pundit's broad brush?   Do you stick up for all the people who will be voting Democrat ticket?
Are you spending your time defending NAMBLA, or sh*tting on police cars, or avoiding paying taxes on your yacht, or wearing Rosie O'Donnell t-shirts?
I'll come to my own conclusions about what I like and don't like.    I'd like to think you will be doing the same.

Posted by jvford on 9/2/2012 12:45:00 AM (view original):
If you're that self conscious about racism in your posts.....there's a good chance you're a racist.

Just sayin'.

If you feel the need to inform someone they might be racist....there's a good chance you're a racist.    Or have no sense of humour.

Just sayin'.

Posted by slowmoe on 9/2/2012 2:51:00 AM (view original):
Why do I have to stick up for or agree with anyone?  Are you painting with the pundit's broad brush?   Do you stick up for all the people who will be voting Democrat ticket?
Are you spending your time defending NAMBLA, or sh*tting on police cars, or avoiding paying taxes on your yacht, or wearing Rosie O'Donnell t-shirts?
I'll come to my own conclusions about what I like and don't like.    I'd like to think you will be doing the same.

You don't have to. No one said you did. Touchy much?

               You don't have to. No one said you did. Touchy much?

Actually someone did.   Read much?  Think much?

Posted by slowmoe on 9/2/2012 5:09:00 AM (view original):
               You don't have to. No one said you did. Touchy much?

Actually someone did.   Read much?  Think much?

No, actually Moe, I did not. Comprehend much? 

<<But I don't see you sticking up for Swamp who wants it both ways...as in "hit it out of the park" and "you saw a bad performance.">>

I made an observation that you don't stick-up for Swamp, after I said you were expressing a difference of opinion, in which I also said "fair enough."

But I never said you needed to or should, nor did I ask why you did not. Simple observation. So, is it a guilt thing?

    "But I don't see you sticking up for Swamp.."

You see, when I saw that written into something you wrote to me,  I thought you were saying   "But I don't see you sticking up for Swamp .."
But I guess you were only saying      "But I don't see you sticking up for Swamp.."   in a different way.

My bad.