Clint Eastwood Topic

But he did serve one good purpose. Finally, a senior citizen who scares PAUL RYAN.
9/3/2012 3:11 PM
CLINT spent his time on stage talking to an empty chair and the delegates loved it. They knew the next speaker was MITT ROMNEY and it was better than listening to an empty suit.
9/3/2012 3:12 PM

ROMNEY’S wife, ANN, did a good job at the convention. During her speech she told how, after they got married she and MITT lived in a basement. It was a 2-room basement apartment — on the French Riviera.

And every night the same dinner — Caviar Helper.

9/3/2012 3:12 PM
9/3/2012 3:20 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/3/2012 1:15:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 9/3/2012 9:15:00 AM (view original):
Methinks its just not liberals mocking him.
It is liberals.

The Republicans were bothered by his comments because they knew it would give the left another distraction so they dont have to talk about Obama's failures.

The left mocks it, calls him senile and makes jokes about it.
So you're basically saying that the republicans were bothered because they realized it was a crazy stupid speech and the democrats would jump on it. So what are we arguing?
9/3/2012 4:41 PM
Not that it was stupid, but that it wasnt in good taste. That it was the kind of stuff that SNL or Colbert would do. That we should always take the high ground.
9/3/2012 4:59 PM
the high road
9/3/2012 5:49 PM
Posted by bagchucker on 9/3/2012 5:49:00 PM (view original):
the high road
it's a war for Swamp...he meant the high ground. Don't go pointing out semantical differences with the way edumacated people palaver.
9/3/2012 6:21 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/3/2012 2:07:00 AM (view original):
What he said is now irelevant. The liberal army of Comedians have declared it funny, so it is.

This is the problem Conservatives face. We get mocked unfairly by the left and cannot respond without being blasted like Eastwood.

So we must take the high ground and hope America will respond to an adult discussion about the issues.
Boo fuckin' hoo.
9/3/2012 6:25 PM
One Billion people around the world make less than $1/day. THREE Billion make less than $2/day. Women sell their bodies and daughters to people like Swamp to try and survive another day. But hell yeah, the Mitt Romney's of the world "deserve" their multi-millions and all legal means of avoiding paying taxes. Because, that's the ethical thing to do.

Let's see, Gates has the Gates Foundation, what does Mitt do? 10% to his church? on $200+ million? How about he go 90% and try and get by on a paltry $20 million?
9/3/2012 6:29 PM
Posted by seamar_116 on 9/3/2012 6:29:00 PM (view original):
One Billion people around the world make less than $1/day. THREE Billion make less than $2/day. Women sell their bodies and daughters to people like Swamp to try and survive another day. But hell yeah, the Mitt Romney's of the world "deserve" their multi-millions and all legal means of avoiding paying taxes. Because, that's the ethical thing to do.

Let's see, Gates has the Gates Foundation, what does Mitt do? 10% to his church? on $200+ million? How about he go 90% and try and get by on a paltry $20 million?

So what are you trying to say?  That everyone that makes more than $2/day should be giving their money away to others?

This type of class warfare is typical liberal histrionics.  Liberals hate Mitt because he's SUCCESSFUL and doesn't share his hard-earned money with lazy deadbeats and welfare cheats that don't contribute to the economy or society.

Hey, seamar and all the other liberal hypocrites around here....  why don't YOU donate 90% of your money to a legitimate charity and post evidence of your largesse on this site?  Maybe then, you can criticize someone who made a fortune without sounding like a whiny *****.

9/3/2012 6:42 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 9/3/2012 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by seamar_116 on 9/3/2012 6:29:00 PM (view original):
One Billion people around the world make less than $1/day. THREE Billion make less than $2/day. Women sell their bodies and daughters to people like Swamp to try and survive another day. But hell yeah, the Mitt Romney's of the world "deserve" their multi-millions and all legal means of avoiding paying taxes. Because, that's the ethical thing to do.

Let's see, Gates has the Gates Foundation, what does Mitt do? 10% to his church? on $200+ million? How about he go 90% and try and get by on a paltry $20 million?

So what are you trying to say?  That everyone that makes more than $2/day should be giving their money away to others?

This type of class warfare is typical liberal histrionics.  Liberals hate Mitt because he's SUCCESSFUL and doesn't share his hard-earned money with lazy deadbeats and welfare cheats that don't contribute to the economy or society.

Hey, seamar and all the other liberal hypocrites around here....  why don't YOU donate 90% of your money to a legitimate charity and post evidence of your largesse on this site?  Maybe then, you can criticize someone who made a fortune without sounding like a whiny *****.

No Todd. What I am trying to point out is that while many of us ***** about paying taxes, we routinely spend twice the daily income for 43% of the world's population for a cup of coffee. Perhaps we should all ***** less, be thankful for what we have, and consider what we can do to try and mitigate the effects of poverty where ever we see it, rather than justify it. Predatory, un-restrained capitalism is not the way to do that.   Some people do consider the "love of money to be the root of all evil." 
9/3/2012 6:51 PM
OK.

I'll quit drinking coffee.

Will that shut you up or will there be yet another demand?

9/3/2012 9:24 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 9/3/2012 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by seamar_116 on 9/3/2012 6:29:00 PM (view original):
One Billion people around the world make less than $1/day. THREE Billion make less than $2/day. Women sell their bodies and daughters to people like Swamp to try and survive another day. But hell yeah, the Mitt Romney's of the world "deserve" their multi-millions and all legal means of avoiding paying taxes. Because, that's the ethical thing to do.

Let's see, Gates has the Gates Foundation, what does Mitt do? 10% to his church? on $200+ million? How about he go 90% and try and get by on a paltry $20 million?

So what are you trying to say?  That everyone that makes more than $2/day should be giving their money away to others?

This type of class warfare is typical liberal histrionics.  Liberals hate Mitt because he's SUCCESSFUL and doesn't share his hard-earned money with lazy deadbeats and welfare cheats that don't contribute to the economy or society.

Hey, seamar and all the other liberal hypocrites around here....  why don't YOU donate 90% of your money to a legitimate charity and post evidence of your largesse on this site?  Maybe then, you can criticize someone who made a fortune without sounding like a whiny *****.

Hard earned money? Hah, I guess putting Americans out of work is a success story nowadays.
9/3/2012 10:01 PM
TRUE!

True story. Obama and the DemoNazis suck pisel.

Make the Democrats go away so we can breath again.
9/3/2012 10:37 PM
◂ Prev 1...6|7|8|9|10...12 Next ▸
Clint Eastwood Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.