Posted by italyprof on 3/9/2016 5:39:00 PM (view original):
Zubinsum, that would be pretty clever or crazy or brilliant, not sure which. Has anyone ever tried anything this radical?
It doesn't work very well. The basic problem is that Sparky seems to prioritize the role over the pitch count - that is, unless your opponent has 4+ guys in a row that bat the same way, your relievers tend to get pulled pretty fast, even if you do set their pitch counts to something higher (for example, 15-20, which would be fairly typical for a Setup guy). Consequently, Sparky will tend to burn through your bullpen every game. I experimented with it one time with a deep bullpen team in the middle of the season. IIRC, I had 9 bullpen arms and 6+ of them were used in 5 of the 7 games I left the bullpen set up that way. So even with something close to the largest reasonable bullpen size, appearance fatigue was going to become a real problem in a hurry if I'd stuck with that configuration. I suppose it could work if your rotation was something like the near-700 inning Lady Baldwin + Silver King and you could reliably depend on 7+ innings from your starters nearly every game you could use 5 or 6 guys set to the specialist roles and maybe have some success with it. But given any sort of normal rotation, where 5-6 inning starts are going to happen, you'll be in trouble. You can do starters + long relievers + specialists, but that doesn't work out great in the late innings. At least, I'm not happy with how pitchers are selected.