How Good? Topic

colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
...Would you be if HD was FULL with humans...1 to 100, 100 being the best...

I think I'd be in the 30s or so, I'm below average to terrible v. humans.

10/24/2012 8:13 PM
gvsujulius
Posts: 873 (0)
Hall of Famer
298
Rookie
I would say I am middle of the road (50-60), most of my teams are A prestige or better, but that doesn't mean much.
10/24/2012 8:25 PM
caesari
Posts: 4817 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 56 144 14
Prospect
If I can't get a winning season NOW....
10/24/2012 10:27 PM
tianyi7886
Posts: 4243 (0)
Hall of Famer
51 33 282 40
Prospect
100. I would love the recruiting strategy that comes with a full human world. 
10/25/2012 12:24 AM
yanks250125
Posts: 876 (0)
Hall of Famer
243 35 19 5 420 44
Prospect
Posted by tianyi7886 on 10/25/2012 12:24:00 AM (view original):
100. I would love the recruiting strategy that comes with a full human world. 
that would be my weakest attribute
10/25/2012 12:31 PM
bistiza
Posts: 3022 (0)
Hall of Famer
40 50 11 185 15
Prospect
In all honesty, probably 25 or so. I'm being humble because I know I have a lot to learn about this game and there are many who are better at it than I am. I just try to do what I can.
10/25/2012 2:14 PM
reinsel
Posts: 927 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 130
Rookie

Depends on the Division and the school and who the other coaches were.  But I'd say 80 if I get to pick my school in D2/D3.  I've done fairly well in most situations.  D2 would be very very different in a full up world.

10/25/2012 2:37 PM
Trentonjoe
Posts: 11794 (1)
Hall of Famer
419 657 54 1
Hall of Famer
I bet I would make the tournament every year and lose in the 1st or 2nd round.....just like I do now.
10/25/2012 2:46 PM
flashlantern
Posts: 50 (0)
Pro
18
Prospect
Is zero an option???
10/25/2012 3:39 PM
therewas47
Posts: 659 (0)
Hall of Famer
156 1
Prospect
I'd say i'm in the 60% or so.  Probably average among experienced guys but newbies would make me look better.
10/25/2012 3:41 PM
coach_billyg
Posts: 2072 (0)
Hall of Famer
92
Pro
i think i would do pretty well... it would REALLY make it tough to have a talent advantage from recruiting, and that was never my primary strength. it was always finding guys who fit nicely and making the most of them, so i think id be pretty well off. IMO, thats the primary difference in your scenario - how do you compare your strength as a raw recruiter (raw talent) to your strength as a team planner and at team setup/game planning.
10/25/2012 3:50 PM
emy1013
Posts: 2731 (0)
Hall of Famer
899
Prospect
If WIS ever opens another world (and I really, really hope they don't), D3 will be full the first season.  384 human coaches.  And a whole lot of people will be shocked at how much more difficult it is to compete in a full world than it is in these barren wastelands they call worlds now.  320 coaches who are used to cruising to NT bids would be PIT at best, nothing at worst.  Would be pretty comical to listen to all the whining when things didn't go their way.
10/26/2012 1:23 AM
bistiza
Posts: 3022 (0)
Hall of Famer
40 50 11 185 15
Prospect
If that happened emy I wouldn't even join the new world, at least not right away. I don't even want to face all humans.
10/26/2012 8:24 AM
udm_mike
Posts: 603 (0)
Hall of Famer
109
Rookie

I think I'd be 70-80 range, judging on success with a full ODAC and very populated Carolina region.  I think the ones that would get in the 90-100 range would be best equipped to run gimmick offenses or defenses.  Find those guys that nobody else wants, but make them fit into their system.

10/26/2012 9:04 AM
chichisteve
Posts: 50 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 184
Prospect
40 or so...Still got a lot to figure out...
10/26/2012 9:33 AM
How Good? Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.