First off, kudos to Seble for creating the Draft Big Board. That's pretty neat.
Now an issue with realism, though. Out of the 100 players on the Naismith Draft Big Board at the end of the season, 100 of them are from Big-6 conferences. That's right, not one of the top 100 draftable players is outside of the 72 schools in the Big 6 conferences.
http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/Postseason/DraftBigBoard.aspx
I don't think that is very realistic. This showcases the major talent disparity between the big 6 and everyone else.
In addition, it's not like the mid-majors aren't having some level of success in Naismith. The MWC has 5 teams in the NT and 3 in the PIT and the MAC has 3 in the NT and 3 in the PIT. However, NOBODY is even considered from these conferences.
I coach in the MWC - so selfishly, I like not losing my players. However, I'm just pointing out how strange this is.
In the 2013 draft in real life for example, 11 of the 48 non-foreign players were from non big-6 conferences, including the #1 pick.
I still think that recruit gen / baseline prestige could be tweaked to create less of a disparity between the big 6 and the mid majors. Obviously a disparity makes sense, but I think the gap is a bit too wide.