Posted by masong83 on 4/14/2016 10:13:00 AM (view original):
I currently run a triangle offense right now I ran normal pace and am contemplating switching to fast paced. I thought it was a bad idea because of my athleticism but looking at other D3 colleges i think it might be a good idea. Im pretty high on durability and speed. Heres my team, any thoughts? https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/TeamProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=7803
Your comment on Durability....ignore it. You need to be looking only at Stamina. If you are going to run uptempo, then your team should have better Stamina and depth (better/deeper bench). Run normal tempo, your team won't be better than your opponents later. Also...Your team has 9 juniors and 2 seniors. Were I you, I would practice triangle & m2m each at 24 or 25 minutes. Your team will then have the advantage on your opponents in terms of team IQ. That will win you games.
A hint: If
Stephen Davis' passing rating is blue (or recently turn black from blue), start him at the point and have
Reynolds come off the bench. The main reason for that is that a m2m team should be starting no one with DEF ratings lower than 40 at D3. Except against zone teams, I would have Reynolds 1st off the bench at both guard positions.
I would suggest the following depth chart: C - Youngberg/Craft/Turner; PF - Simon/Craft/Turner; SF - Cole/Willbanks; SG - Howland/Smith/Reynolds; PG - Davis/Reynolds. You can still redshirt
Militello or
Smith. I suggest trying Militello first. As long as he doesn't drop below 20 WE, then I'd leave it on him. Below that, take it off and RS Smith. Just take them both entirely out of your Depth Chart until you've figured out which on to RS. If you stay at Juniata, that will help.