Posted by the0nlyis on 7/8/2016 12:19:00 PM (view original):
why should D3 be able to recruit on par with D1, I've never actually heard his argument for that besides calling everyone background noise who disagrees with him.
I wouldn't have believed it but I almost hate someone here more than seble in spud
I swear seble made this account to deflect anger away from his true posts, let spud take it all in
I know he posts mostly in the beta, but this is a point that I'd really like to hear him address. I, and many others I assume, would really like to know why he thinks that D3 and D1 should be on even ground as far as recruiting goes. Why should a tiny D3 team have the same recruiting "power" as Duke? That's not "background noise" that's a legitimate question.
So there it is Spud, set up specifically for you. In case you're easily confused or missed it the first time, why do you think that ALL schools (D1, D2, and D3) should be on equal footing when it comes to recruiting a player? Why should my D2 Henderson State team have the same recruiting "pull" as SEC Arkansas? Why should Rose-Hulman (a D3 team in Terre Haute, IN) be on equal footing as BIG 10 Indiana University? I am truly interested in your thinking on this issue?
But, of course, I'm sure that you'll just use your "background noise" excuse to avoid the question altogether. Don't take the coward way out Spud, let us know why YOU believe that every school should be on equal footing in regards to recruiting?