OLD ENGINE OR NEW ENGINE Topic

gators55
Posts: 57 (0)
Hall of Famer
152 16 33
Prospect
New with the old recruits.
6/26/2010 1:40 PM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
New engine and new recruits.  I LOVE the new recruits.
6/26/2010 5:13 PM
rak
Posts: 59 (0)
Hall of Famer
19 1 156 2 1
Prospect
New engine 
6/26/2010 5:19 PM
jetsons
Posts: 2459 (0)
Hall of Famer
77 147
Prospect
old
6/26/2010 5:23 PM
dahsdebater
Posts: 10041 (0)
Hall of Famer
284 292 18
Pro
New, but it's close.  I think there needs to be a happy medium for HCA between where it was in the old engine and where it is now.
6/26/2010 6:09 PM
slicknick777
Posts: 305 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 401 43 116 2
Prospect
New, I gotta think things are going to get better... or maybe cause I won a title in the new engine :)
6/26/2010 6:19 PM
jetsons
Posts: 2459 (0)
Hall of Famer
77 147
Prospect
What changed in HCA?

6/26/2010 6:41 PM
atrain9954
Posts: 88 (0)
Hall of Famer
246 20 81
Prospect

New because things will eventually be worked out... at least I hope.

6/26/2010 7:48 PM
hitman1979
Posts: 449 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 166 148 31
Prospect
Posted by tkimble on 6/26/2010 5:13:00 PM (view original):
New engine and new recruits.  I LOVE the new recruits.
Here's the issue for me - at the lower levels, the new recruits are fine.  At least in my experience.  I haven't noticed much difference with my Whitman team, and didn't notice much of a difference with my New Haven (Tark) team, either.  It's at D1 where you see the big difference.
6/26/2010 9:13 PM
kmasonbx
Posts: 847 (0)
Hall of Famer
210
Prospect
I'm going with new engine for everything. The one thing that I think is concerning about the new engine is recruits seem to have too many hi/hi potential areas. In the old engine most recruits hi potential areas were normal hi it seems like it's the opposite in the new engine.
6/26/2010 9:32 PM
emy1013
Posts: 2731 (0)
Hall of Famer
899
Prospect
Posted by dalter on 6/26/2010 9:09:00 AM (view original):
Right now, old engine.

If seble can fix the handful of consistent problems that are plaguing this engine, then it'll definitely be the new engine. But he's gotta come through.
Wow, this is classic.  A couple of weeks ago, I said that the new engine was a bust (this when they had to bring it back in for some major tune-ups.  About the time that they reset the first two worlds that were using it).  I said then that I would have loved to have kept the old engine until the new one was ACTUALLY ready to be rolled out.  A certain coach jumped all over me using the argument that the old engine had some major/fatal flaws and asked why I would want to continue using a faulty engine with known deficiencies.  Well, lo and behold, that coach is quoted above saying that at this point in time, because of "consistent problems" with the new version, he'd rather use the old engine.  You know, the one I got dogged about because it had known faults, flaws, and deficiencies.  How ironic........... 
6/27/2010 3:31 AM (edited)
uglyskunk3
Posts: 550 (0)
Hall of Famer
156
Prospect
Posted by emy1013 on 6/27/2010 3:31:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dalter on 6/26/2010 9:09:00 AM (view original):
Right now, old engine.

If seble can fix the handful of consistent problems that are plaguing this engine, then it'll definitely be the new engine. But he's gotta come through.
Wow, this is classic.  A couple of weeks ago, I said that the new engine was a bust (this when they had to bring it back in for some major tune-ups.  About the time that they reset the first two worlds that were using it).  I said then that I would have loved to have kept the old engine until the new one was ACTUALLY ready to be rolled out.  A certain coach jumped all over me using the argument that the old engine had some major/fatal flaws and asked why I would want to continue using a faulty engine with known deficiencies.  Well, lo and behold, that coach is quoted above saying that at this point in time, because of "consistent problems" with the new version, he'd rather use the old engine.  You know, the one I got dogged about because it had known faults, flaws, and deficiencies.  How ironic........... 
oh snap if that is true, then dalter is a clown! yo! yo! you nailed his hiney!
6/27/2010 4:43 AM
grecianfox
Posts: 131 (0)
Hall of Famer
759 5 72 11
Rookie
Old engine by a wide margin so far. I'm willing to keep an open mind but may be cutting a squad soon.
6/27/2010 11:32 AM
ike1024
Posts: 410 (0)
Hall of Famer
59
Prospect
51/49 old.  Fixed a lot of problems, but I really don't like the stamina/FT/fastbreak offense issue I've been noticing at the lower levels.
6/27/2010 11:48 AM
hitman1979
Posts: 449 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 166 148 31
Prospect
Posted by emy1013 on 6/27/2010 3:31:00 AM (view original):
Posted by dalter on 6/26/2010 9:09:00 AM (view original):
Right now, old engine.

If seble can fix the handful of consistent problems that are plaguing this engine, then it'll definitely be the new engine. But he's gotta come through.
Wow, this is classic.  A couple of weeks ago, I said that the new engine was a bust (this when they had to bring it back in for some major tune-ups.  About the time that they reset the first two worlds that were using it).  I said then that I would have loved to have kept the old engine until the new one was ACTUALLY ready to be rolled out.  A certain coach jumped all over me using the argument that the old engine had some major/fatal flaws and asked why I would want to continue using a faulty engine with known deficiencies.  Well, lo and behold, that coach is quoted above saying that at this point in time, because of "consistent problems" with the new version, he'd rather use the old engine.  You know, the one I got dogged about because it had known faults, flaws, and deficiencies.  How ironic........... 
Sad, but not surprising, given the person in question's track record.
6/27/2010 12:45 PM
◂ Prev 1234 Next ▸
OLD ENGINE OR NEW ENGINE Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.