Posted by dcy0827 on 8/13/2010 8:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pinkeye on 8/13/2010 8:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dcy0827 on 8/13/2010 8:12:00 PM (view original):
Excellent, my guess would have been right on the money!  We'll let everyone else see if they can figure it out for themselves.  By the way, that was specifically why I used the word "stalker" in this thread, because of that thread.  I was just about 100% sure who I was arguing with and I thought you'd find that choice of words a bit amusing.  Your use of the word "delusional" was what sealed the deal though.  Clever, and yes, I picked up on it.  :^)

great detective work, droolcup.

i'm not sure if i should feel bad for sullying anton's good name or just assume he deserves it.

It is interesting though, don't you think, that Anton posts and Pinkeye posts 1 minute later.  I mean, what would be the odds of THAT happening?  Not implying anything here, but that's just long enough to log out, log in, and type a quick two line message.  Just weird.............

Yeah, that was well-played on pinkeye's part.

If he's lurking on the thread and waiting to see if I post again so he can try the same trick, then he should be posting again right about as I post this. If I wait a few more seconds. Hitting Submit.... now.

THis still about its original purpose?

 

Posted by antonsirius on 8/13/2010 8:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dcy0827 on 8/13/2010 8:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pinkeye on 8/13/2010 8:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dcy0827 on 8/13/2010 8:12:00 PM (view original):
Excellent, my guess would have been right on the money!  We'll let everyone else see if they can figure it out for themselves.  By the way, that was specifically why I used the word "stalker" in this thread, because of that thread.  I was just about 100% sure who I was arguing with and I thought you'd find that choice of words a bit amusing.  Your use of the word "delusional" was what sealed the deal though.  Clever, and yes, I picked up on it.  :^)

great detective work, droolcup.

i'm not sure if i should feel bad for sullying anton's good name or just assume he deserves it.

It is interesting though, don't you think, that Anton posts and Pinkeye posts 1 minute later.  I mean, what would be the odds of THAT happening?  Not implying anything here, but that's just long enough to log out, log in, and type a quick two line message.  Just weird.............

Yeah, that was well-played on pinkeye's part.

If he's lurking on the thread and waiting to see if I post again so he can try the same trick, then he should be posting again right about as I post this. If I wait a few more seconds. Hitting Submit.... now.

o hey

Posted by furry_nipps on 8/13/2010 8:55:00 PM (view original):
If you really think its just the user name, post as someone nobody knows you as and see how quickly people will STILL think you are annoying. Its the way you post, not the user name.

I don't need to muck my identity and who I am just to try to save face and "befriend" everyone here...that's weak.  It's more of a challenge to rebuild and recoup my reputation than it is merely to puss out, switch to another name, and post trying to make innernet friends.

And I'll ask you the same thing that I asked aintheb...what posts/threads are you referring to?  Where/how was I annoying?

Posted by 4green2 on 8/13/2010 8:59:00 PM (view original):

THis still about its original purpose?

 

Dude, your glaring keyboard skills , or lackthereof, give you away every single time.  STop holding SHift down so long...........

Precisely the way you are annoying in this thread, Colonels.

Posted by a_in_the_b on 8/13/2010 9:06:00 PM (view original):
Precisely the way you are annoying in this thread, Colonels.

Touche...Please list all of my arguments that you think lacked merit, because I would like to truly agree or disagree.  I'll give you a freebee, the 50% make/miss thing was a f***ing joke on my end, I made a complete *** of myself and made some ridiculous claims there.  Again, please list the arguments, because I'd love to return fire.  If you won't do this, simply explain why you won't.

Posted by colonels19 on 8/13/2010 9:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by 4green2 on 8/13/2010 8:59:00 PM (view original):

THis still about its original purpose?

 

Dude, your glaring keyboard skills , or lackthereof, give you away every single time.  STop holding SHift down so long...........

Huh?

ltm

Posted by colonels19 on 8/13/2010 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by furry_nipps on 8/13/2010 8:55:00 PM (view original):
If you really think its just the user name, post as someone nobody knows you as and see how quickly people will STILL think you are annoying. Its the way you post, not the user name.

I don't need to muck my identity and who I am just to try to save face and "befriend" everyone here...that's weak.  It's more of a challenge to rebuild and recoup my reputation than it is merely to puss out, switch to another name, and post trying to make innernet friends.

And I'll ask you the same thing that I asked aintheb...what posts/threads are you referring to?  Where/how was I annoying?

It started with your annoying BPI crap. After that was the 50/50 thing. After that was always going out of your way to be negative towards the game in every thread, even when all the vets chimed in and agreed the game needs help, but the thing you are crying about was just you blowing things way out. You wouldn't accept it and continued you to argue until people would just give up on you and you felt you won. You'd argue things that don't need to be argued just to try to fight. You can never accept that you are wrong, other then ONE time with the 50/50 thing that was laughable. Not everyone of your posts are annoying, its just when you start turning stuff into a 10 page **** match for no reason. If you want to be respected, then give people some respect. Don't be a little ***** to seble and everyone else who posts on the forums and then wonder why nobody can stand you.

Posted by furry_nipps on 8/13/2010 9:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by colonels19 on 8/13/2010 9:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by furry_nipps on 8/13/2010 8:55:00 PM (view original):
If you really think its just the user name, post as someone nobody knows you as and see how quickly people will STILL think you are annoying. Its the way you post, not the user name.

I don't need to muck my identity and who I am just to try to save face and "befriend" everyone here...that's weak.  It's more of a challenge to rebuild and recoup my reputation than it is merely to puss out, switch to another name, and post trying to make innernet friends.

And I'll ask you the same thing that I asked aintheb...what posts/threads are you referring to?  Where/how was I annoying?

It started with your annoying BPI crap. After that was the 50/50 thing. After that was always going out of your way to be negative towards the game in every thread, even when all the vets chimed in and agreed the game needs help, but the thing you are crying about was just you blowing things way out. You wouldn't accept it and continued you to argue until people would just give up on you and you felt you won. You'd argue things that don't need to be argued just to try to fight. You can never accept that you are wrong, other then ONE time with the 50/50 thing that was laughable. Not everyone of your posts are annoying, its just when you start turning stuff into a 10 page **** match for no reason. If you want to be respected, then give people some respect. Don't be a little ***** to seble and everyone else who posts on the forums and then wonder why nobody can stand you.

So that's all you have...2 threads...1 being specific?  Going out of my way to be negative towards the sim?  I spoke out about things that weren't working well in the sim...what am I supposed to do, post how great the sim is when it really isn't?  Not create any of my own posts, simply agree with snobby WIS vets when they make "estute" negative posts about the sim?  Whether you all like it or not, you have an annoying double standard.

The BPI stuff, especially in December 2009, was incredibly sim relevant.  I was really going to pitch my system to WIS and/or try to rank some seasons, but unfortunately, it just wasn't/isn't feasible, and other users confirmed this premise.  Regardless of what metsmax says, there were never enough people on board to follow through with the result tabbing process.  I've BPIed 3 other HD instances to see how my rankings would be different than what the actuals said, and I think it brought forth some pretty interesting data.  The FFB thing I was trying to capitalize on the number of haters I had/have, and it didn't work...you guys squelched the thread with your negative listings (weak?)...you win.

If I remember correctly, the 50/50 thing, while completely ridiculous, wasn't the main topic of that thread....rather something you guys jumped on and ran with and proceeded to take in a certain direction.  This could have been the Montevallo thread?  Regardless, no matter how much I admit I'm wrong, apologize, etc...I don't recoup anything with any of you, so why should I even bother?  All of you say you're annoying, I'm blocking you, change your attitude, etc, etc, but frankly none of this will matter if you don't open your minds and give me another chance, and that's been the case.  Nothing I do will ever be good enough for many of the snobs here, so why the f*** should I bother, to oblige those who think they deserve my respect?  Not a chance.

People don't like that I'm not a pushover.  People don't like that I don't just accept majority sim opinions.  People don't like that I gripe and gripe hard when I feel something is wrong with the sim.  Who's problem is that really...mine or yours?  You guys are not open-minded, you have an "agree with us or you're wrong" mantra, and you never admit when you're wrong, apologize, or concede legitimate/logical points like I do...so again, why is there this humongous expectation of me, yet you aren't held to the same standards?  Why would I want to respect/be respected by people who just always think what they say is right just because of their tenure?  A lot of you simply don't understand the 2-sidedness of arguments, you just say colonels is being colonels, when in fact I'm just responding to you the way that your comments drive me to do so.  Again, you want to be civil...we'll be civil...try it, you'll see.  You want to come at me...let's dance *****...I'll go all night.  You get what you want out of me, and you don't understand that it's YOU who delegates what you get out of me.  You want decent responses, give me decent responses...it's called give and take.  My battles with seble go back 5 or 6 years, so you really have no place to tell me how I should or shouldn't handle my "relationship" with him, because you're not even vaguely familiar with what's happened.

If respecting any of you means kissing your *** or blindly agreeing with you because you're an HD "expert", you're dealing with the wrong guy, because being liked isn't my main priority, nor does it invalidate my posts.  I'm not the biggest problem here.

Exhibit a:

 

And Colonels?  The reason I am not going to bring up particular threads is because I am not interested in starting up . . 

Let me put it this way:  In the early days of programming when you were writing in basic you would have people write a program basically similar to:

 

10: print "I am repeating myself"

20: "Goto 10"

It would sit there just displaying "I am repeating myself' in flickering lines going down the screen.

Arguments or debates in threads with you feel that way to me.  The only way to make progress is to 'Stop playing' so to speak.

 

Posted by a_in_the_b on 8/13/2010 9:42:00 PM (view original):

Exhibit a:

 

And Colonels?  The reason I am not going to bring up particular threads is because I am not interested in starting up . . 

Let me put it this way:  In the early days of programming when you were writing in basic you would have people write a program basically similar to:

 

10: print "I am repeating myself"

20: "Goto 10"

It would sit there just displaying "I am repeating myself' in flickering lines going down the screen.

Arguments or debates in threads with you feel that way to me.  The only way to make progress is to 'Stop playing' so to speak.

 

And the same old pattern persists.  You call me out about posts/threads I've made that lacked merit....I ask you to name/list said posts/threads...and you're done "arguing".

Just because you've avoided these same types of challenges in the past, doesn't mean that you've addressed the issues at hand...but you were right about one thing....you do just repeat yourself time and again "I'm not going to do that" "I'm not going to do that" "I'm not going to do that".

Look, you want to keep calling me out for being an *******, fine...back it up...you continue not to, so maybe you shouldn't keep calling me out huh?  It's all about give and take man, and you just keep taking...

Uh, no. You be negative to be negative. Within hours of the new forums, it was a "FAIL" to you even though everyone liked it before you tried it. Once someone said they'd block you, which you knew would happen you said they couldn't handle you. Really? C'mon. Stfu. They blocked you because you are annoying. I'm not getting into this again, but everyone explained it. You were the only one dumb enough to understand it, and wanted to argue by saying the same crap that people can't handle you. I'm not going to explain anymore into it. I don't need to explain why you are annoying. You should go re-read some of your posts and you'll see how big of a joke you are. I will not reply to anymore to you in this thread, because I'm not going to waste anymore time on this. Obviously that means I can't handle you, but in real terms it just means you are annoying and a waste of time. Not 100% of the time, but close enough that I'm not going to waste my time trying to figure out if your being negative douche colon trying to play the victim card or not.

Posted by furry_nipps on 8/13/2010 9:48:00 PM (view original):
Uh, no. You be negative to be negative. Within hours of the new forums, it was a "FAIL" to you even though everyone liked it before you tried it. Once someone said they'd block you, which you knew would happen you said they couldn't handle you. Really? C'mon. Stfu. They blocked you because you are annoying. I'm not getting into this again, but everyone explained it. You were the only one dumb enough to understand it, and wanted to argue by saying the same crap that people can't handle you. I'm not going to explain anymore into it. I don't need to explain why you are annoying. You should go re-read some of your posts and you'll see how big of a joke you are. I will not reply to anymore to you in this thread, because I'm not going to waste anymore time on this. Obviously that means I can't handle you, but in real terms it just means you are annoying and a waste of time. Not 100% of the time, but close enough that I'm not going to waste my time trying to figure out if your being negative douche colon trying to play the victim card or not.

Way to avoid almost EVERYTHING I posted....unreal.

The forums weren't compatible with IE 6.0 which is what I had, thus they were detrimental to my usage.  There was really no reason to change over the forums...blocking people and the like is unnecessary...self control goes a long way.  I downloaded IE 7.0 for work, and now the forums work, I apologized, they're great, and I'm moving forward...again, what more do you want from me?

Blocking people is weak, and it does show that you can't/don't want to put up with someone.  You can do that without blocking by choosing just to not read said posts...again I'm repeating myself.

So you've blocked me and skirted a great majority of my response to your post...so please tell me, what exactly should my opinion be of you?