What makes someone a good scorer.... Topic

Posted by coach_billyg on 1/25/2011 11:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 1/25/2011 8:23:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tianyi7886 on 1/25/2011 12:53:00 AM (view original):
I'm trollish? This is coming from a guy who opposes anyone w/o a D3 NC to comment about D3, and thinks that multiple D1-D2 NCs are worthless? This is coming from a guy who has said the following, and various version of the following:

""its not hard to win at d3" w. i just looked at your record hot shot and you didn't win jack at d3. do you really think your wins with north carolina mean more then my d3 championships? they don't. "

And it looks like I'm not the only one who thinks you are being overtly hostile, because earlier on, dcy said the same thing. 

And I think you are the one who started the name calling with knucklehead? And if I'm such a knucklehead and as you said, you are not accusing him of those NCs not existing, why do you bother checking over his resumes extensively (obviously not extensive enough) and keep asking where those NCs are, even after it's clear from the posts by dahs and coach_billyg himself that they are in Rupp, under his coach_billyg acct?

If simple logic and being thorough when one makes accusations (which you clearly are with your posts, implying those NCs don't exist) trollish, then you have my sincere apology of me being a logical and thorough perrson. 

yes you are being a troll. i "oppose anyone w/o a d3 nc to comment about d3"???? that isn't what i said. that statement alone makes your actions trollish. that comment is directed at one poster, gillespie, on the context that i only knew him as gillespie not his four other usernames. for that you are a troll. at that time i didn't know he was billyg. at that time he was a coach who had only won with cherry picking d1 teams. so in context to that i didn't think a guy who couldn't get out the first round of the nt in d3 should make comments about d3. fanning the flames makes you a troll. read before you post.

"thinks that multiple d1, d2 nc are worthless"????????? once again i never made that statement. again that makes you a troll. i'm defending d3 championships value, and i'd be happy to say and know that they are on equal footing to d1, d2 championships. he pointed out the flaws of d3 and i pointed out the flaws of d1. so once again your actions are trollish.

hostile? more like defensive. i would always defend what i say and what i mean and when someone like yourself manipulates the meaning, or infers devious motives i tend to get a bit hostile. i'm surprised because your normally okay person on here, but your actions over the last several hours are atrocious.

wow. you just went from having little credibility and sort of being a ***** to having 0 credibility and being an *******. i never said one bad thing about you. but you call what is objectively one of a very few accomplishment in the running for the greatest ever, only winning with cherry picked teams? you obviously don't know your head from your *******, but if they works for you, then hey, go with it.

and tianyi is a good guy. its pretty clear you are the dick in this thread, hopefully by now most coaches have stopped reading your useless dribble. have a nice day, as they say, ignorance is bliss! 
never said one bad thing about me? okay buddy. now your a liar. look at your first two posts in this thread. you comment that d3 championships aren't as important as d1 championships. and hey thats your opinion, and i think your wrong, and once again i only saw your cherry picked d1 championships so that is all you were to me at the time. i've already said that i was wrong, but i had no clue i was wrong at the time. how is that so hard to get through yours and troll's head? and yes i think winning with colorado, texas a&m, and kentucky isn't that impressive as compared to a midmajor d1 winning. yes i think baseline for d1 is training wheels for coaches. and yes i think that many mediocre d3 coaches jump to d2, then they become mediocre coaches at d2 and jump to d1, so the implication you made that d1 is superior to d3 is a slight at me or any other coach with a d3 championships.

not to mention your first post that implies my advice on perimeter rating is potentially harmful to coaches is a slight at me, so you get your head out of your butt and look in the mirror. like i said i was wrong about your accomplishments, but when i ask you a question i expect you to answer the question and not have a troll come running to your defense when once again it wasn't needed.
1/25/2011 11:43 AM (edited)
skunk, why you think my post about d3 was a shot at you, i don't know. but it wasn't. and you said per only mattered for 3s. that is dead wrong. i pointed that out. nothing wrong with it. if you post something so wrong again, i will post a dissenting opinion again. thats how the forums work... and its important for younger coaches who don't know enough to see immediately that you are dead wrong, that there are other opinions out there. thats all.

i don't care that you don't know my different names and all that. its still every bit as ridiculous that you would call me out for comparing d3 to d1 by my d3 resume when you are stating your opinion on the same subject without ever having played a GAME in d1. why don't you give that a try and then get back to me on how hard it is to win championships there? and besides, my d1 resume on gillispie has nothing to do with anything else i've done, so you can't hide your cherry picking nonsense behind "i didn't know your names".

finally, you say "so the implication you made that d1 is superior to d3 is a slight at me or any other coach with a d3 championships. ". well, i have almost as many d3 titles as you, so i guess i slighted myself about as much as i slighted you. so maybe you should get over it?

if you had, you know, won a single game in d1, maybe you would understand why people think d1 is harder. d2/d3 are roughly the same, except that d3 worlds are more depleted and thus today many people feel those worlds' titles are the easiest. no doubt some d3 titles are harder to come by than some d2 titles. but d1 is totally different. if you look at the # of d1 vs d2 vs d3 teams of the top 100 coaches in HD or so, there are dramatically more d1 teams. alblack is reknown for being a great coach who doesn't play d1. who is reknown for being a great coach who only plays d1? nobody, because there are SO many of them. the competition in d1 is simply a lot harder, and until you go play d1, your opinion on that really isn't worth two *****. plus, early entries in d1 make it *dramatically* harder to rattle off multiple titles in d1 than in d2/d3. there is absolutely no question on that by coaches who have a clue. so you are being really defense about something that A) you don't know **** about and that B) you are totally wrong about.
1/25/2011 11:56 AM
Posted by coach_billyg on 1/25/2011 11:57:00 AM (view original):
skunk, why you think my post about d3 was a shot at you, i don't know. but it wasn't. and you said per only mattered for 3s. that is dead wrong. i pointed that out. nothing wrong with it. if you post something so wrong again, i will post a dissenting opinion again. thats how the forums work... and its important for younger coaches who don't know enough to see immediately that you are dead wrong, that there are other opinions out there. thats all.

i don't care that you don't know my different names and all that. its still every bit as ridiculous that you would call me out for comparing d3 to d1 by my d3 resume when you are stating your opinion on the same subject without ever having played a GAME in d1. why don't you give that a try and then get back to me on how hard it is to win championships there? and besides, my d1 resume on gillispie has nothing to do with anything else i've done, so you can't hide your cherry picking nonsense behind "i didn't know your names".

finally, you say "so the implication you made that d1 is superior to d3 is a slight at me or any other coach with a d3 championships. ". well, i have almost as many d3 titles as you, so i guess i slighted myself about as much as i slighted you. so maybe you should get over it?

if you had, you know, won a single game in d1, maybe you would understand why people think d1 is harder. d2/d3 are roughly the same, except that d3 worlds are more depleted and thus today many people feel those worlds' titles are the easiest. no doubt some d3 titles are harder to come by than some d2 titles. but d1 is totally different. if you look at the # of d1 vs d2 vs d3 teams of the top 100 coaches in HD or so, there are dramatically more d1 teams. alblack is reknown for being a great coach who doesn't play d1. who is reknown for being a great coach who only plays d1? nobody, because there are SO many of them. the competition in d1 is simply a lot harder, and until you go play d1, your opinion on that really isn't worth two *****. plus, early entries in d1 make it *dramatically* harder to rattle off multiple titles in d1 than in d2/d3. there is absolutely no question on that by coaches who have a clue. so you are being really defense about something that A) you don't know **** about and that B) you are totally wrong about.
per does only matter for 3's and my resume seems to suggest i know what i'm doing. dead wrong? what a joke. do coaches pick up a 80 perimeter guy for his midrange jumper? lol come on. let me clarify the statement a bit for yah. per rating only matters to 3pt frequency adjustments. you can post a dissenting opinion and i don't have a problem with that. i didn't bite you over that comment, but just saying i was wrong is fine, you took it a step further so take responsibility for your post.

you almost have as many d3 titles as me, almost.

actually i don't have a d1 team, this is true, but i have mentored a lot of coaches with their d1 teams. they come to me asking for my help and of course i'm glad to help. i have game planned for d1 nt tournaments and have gotten coach after coach upsets that they never dreamed of. i am more then confident that my philosphy does work in d1 because i've seen it work.

once again, i've seen plenty of coaches who have had modest success at d3 that jumped to d2 and had more modest success, and finally leaped to d1. i don't think you should move up a level til you mastered the first level, but hey that's me.
1/25/2011 12:15 PM (edited)
by the way billyg why don't you address the original thread and give some of your legendary advice on what makes a good scorer, gee that would be refreshing. i'd love to hear your thoughts.
1/25/2011 12:22 PM
i think inside players are better scorers consistantly than outside guys...  so go C/PF i'd go high ath and LP... Mediocre BH is OK... for guards I want extremely high BH, speed, and a combo of LP and PE... higher the ath the better...
1/25/2011 12:24 PM
FWIW, I've been flummoxed by the inconsistency of my teams over the several seasons I've played, and Skunk has given me some pointers that have borne some pretty good early fruit. I don't consider myself nearly expert or advanced enough to weigh in on the level that you guys are debating, but as far as I'm concerned, Skunk has some very interesting ideas that may line up pretty well with how player ratings translate into good performance in the HD engine.
1/25/2011 12:26 PM
Seble has stated on multiple occassions that PE is not limited in its impact to 3-point shots. Then again, Seble only re-wrote the engine and does not have DIII titles as far as I know.
1/25/2011 12:33 PM
bored at work, geoff?
1/25/2011 1:03 PM
"per does only matter for 3's"

No, it doesn't.  End of story.  You're wrong, and there's no one who agrees with you, including the creator of the engine.  Believing that it doesn't have much effect on two-point jumpers is not the same as having no effect.  It has some effect, that's just a fact.

As for this ridiculousness, D1 is harder than D2/D3. It's not even close, really.  How many battles do you have when you recruit?  Probably none, I'd imagine.  Once you get to be an A+ school, which is basically just one great year, you get the pick of any recruits you want who you can pull down.  How tough is that?  At D1, you're constantly in battles, and getting the guy you want is infinitely more difficult.

Yes, I'm sure the comeback will be that you're better than me.  That's fine, I'm sure you are, but that's irrelevant when we're discussing divisions yuo've never played in.  And you're not better than billy, and it's not even close.
1/25/2011 1:11 PM
Posted by isack24 on 1/25/2011 1:12:00 PM (view original):
"per does only matter for 3's"

No, it doesn't.  End of story.  You're wrong, and there's no one who agrees with you, including the creator of the engine.  Believing that it doesn't have much effect on two-point jumpers is not the same as having no effect.  It has some effect, that's just a fact.

As for this ridiculousness, D1 is harder than D2/D3. It's not even close, really.  How many battles do you have when you recruit?  Probably none, I'd imagine.  Once you get to be an A+ school, which is basically just one great year, you get the pick of any recruits you want who you can pull down.  How tough is that?  At D1, you're constantly in battles, and getting the guy you want is infinitely more difficult.

Yes, I'm sure the comeback will be that you're better than me.  That's fine, I'm sure you are, but that's irrelevant when we're discussing divisions yuo've never played in.  And you're not better than billy, and it's not even close.
why don't you finish the quote? don't just take a quote without reading the entire post. dumb

btw i took over a d+ prestige d2 school and with a lineup full of sophomores and freshmen i've taken them to the final four of the PIT after less then two full seasons. how yah like me now?

and looking at your resume you should listen to what i say and stop talking about things you don't know anything about.

and i'll finish the quote for you since i don't you think you have the reading skills to get past one sentence. lol i added, "let me clarify the statement a bit for yah. per rating only matters to 3pt frequency adjustments."

1/25/2011 1:28 PM (edited)

That's what you initially stated; there was no "end of the quote."  You took issue with billyg calling you out for the initial post, which he had every right to do because it was wrong. 

You modified it now, great.  I'm glad you did that.  Doesn't change the fact that you made misleading statement and have subsequently gotten upset with everyone who has called you out on it.

Instead of continuing to be an ***, you could just own that you said something totally incorrect, which could be misleading to a new coach, and we can all move on.

1/25/2011 1:28 PM
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 1/25/2011 1:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 1/25/2011 1:12:00 PM (view original):
"per does only matter for 3's"

No, it doesn't.  End of story.  You're wrong, and there's no one who agrees with you, including the creator of the engine.  Believing that it doesn't have much effect on two-point jumpers is not the same as having no effect.  It has some effect, that's just a fact.

As for this ridiculousness, D1 is harder than D2/D3. It's not even close, really.  How many battles do you have when you recruit?  Probably none, I'd imagine.  Once you get to be an A+ school, which is basically just one great year, you get the pick of any recruits you want who you can pull down.  How tough is that?  At D1, you're constantly in battles, and getting the guy you want is infinitely more difficult.

Yes, I'm sure the comeback will be that you're better than me.  That's fine, I'm sure you are, but that's irrelevant when we're discussing divisions yuo've never played in.  And you're not better than billy, and it's not even close.
why don't you finish the quote? don't just take a quote without reading the entire post. dumb

btw i took over a d+ prestige d2 school and with a lineup full of sophomores and freshmen i've taken them to the final four of the PIT after less then two full seasons. how yah like me now?

and looking at your resume you should listen to what i say and stop talking about things you don't know anything about.

and i'll finish the quote for you since i don't you think you have the reading skills to get past one sentence. lol i added, "let me clarify the statement a bit for yah. per rating only matters to 3pt frequency adjustments."

I love how I knew exactly what your response would be.  Yeah, I've had minimal success.  Only one NCOY and only a few final fours.  No championships.  I'm not claiming to be a great coach, but I certainly know what the game is about.

As for D2, no, D2 is nothing compared to D1.  It's more fun, that's why I left my D1 program instead of trying to move to a BCS school, but it's not even close to the same.  Until you've played D1, you can't comment on it.  I think that should be pretty obvious.
1/25/2011 1:30 PM
so now that i clarified the quote your gonna harp on the original quote. okay have a debate with original quote. if i didn't think the quote needed to be clarified i wouldn't have. harping over that fact makes you look foolish.
1/25/2011 1:31 PM
Posted by isack24 on 1/25/2011 1:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by uglyskunk3 on 1/25/2011 1:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 1/25/2011 1:12:00 PM (view original):
"per does only matter for 3's"

No, it doesn't.  End of story.  You're wrong, and there's no one who agrees with you, including the creator of the engine.  Believing that it doesn't have much effect on two-point jumpers is not the same as having no effect.  It has some effect, that's just a fact.

As for this ridiculousness, D1 is harder than D2/D3. It's not even close, really.  How many battles do you have when you recruit?  Probably none, I'd imagine.  Once you get to be an A+ school, which is basically just one great year, you get the pick of any recruits you want who you can pull down.  How tough is that?  At D1, you're constantly in battles, and getting the guy you want is infinitely more difficult.

Yes, I'm sure the comeback will be that you're better than me.  That's fine, I'm sure you are, but that's irrelevant when we're discussing divisions yuo've never played in.  And you're not better than billy, and it's not even close.
why don't you finish the quote? don't just take a quote without reading the entire post. dumb

btw i took over a d+ prestige d2 school and with a lineup full of sophomores and freshmen i've taken them to the final four of the PIT after less then two full seasons. how yah like me now?

and looking at your resume you should listen to what i say and stop talking about things you don't know anything about.

and i'll finish the quote for you since i don't you think you have the reading skills to get past one sentence. lol i added, "let me clarify the statement a bit for yah. per rating only matters to 3pt frequency adjustments."

I love how I knew exactly what your response would be.  Yeah, I've had minimal success.  Only one NCOY and only a few final fours.  No championships.  I'm not claiming to be a great coach, but I certainly know what the game is about.

As for D2, no, D2 is nothing compared to D1.  It's more fun, that's why I left my D1 program instead of trying to move to a BCS school, but it's not even close to the same.  Until you've played D1, you can't comment on it.  I think that should be pretty obvious.
but you are my argument. you coach at d1 and shouldn't. your not that good of a coach. you haven't mastered d3 or d2, and should go back to the lower levels and learn why you can't get over the hump.
1/25/2011 1:32 PM
"not to mention your first post that implies my advice on perimeter rating is potentially harmful to coaches is a slight at me"

That's what you said on this page that annoyed me.  If it was a slight at you, then you deserved it.  Instead of continuing to be a dick at that point, you could have just said, "fine, I was wrong."  But yeah, I'm the one looking foolish.

Getting involved at all was foolish, I'll give you that.
1/25/2011 1:34 PM
◂ Prev 1...3|4|5|6|7 Next ▸
What makes someone a good scorer.... Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.