http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=1786373

Check out what this guy has done it 8 games so far in Phelan. I'm so confused as to how he is scoring so much with bad speed and ball handling ratings. I'm sure he has over 50% distro set but still 39.5 ppg with 58 speed and 45 ball handling? Yeah he has 99 PE but does his ATH/PE combo make him that dominate? I was always under the impressing speed and ball handling were extremely important for guards to be effective.

Why exactly does he need great sp just to shoot threes? If you want your guard to do something besides shoot threes, you would do well to get more speed than that. But this guy is literally taking all of his shots from behind the arc.

Also, keep in mind that six of those eight games were against sims that were (a) crappy and (b) unable to double team. (And in the two human games -- both losses -- he faced a fcp and then inexplicably was not doubled the second game.) Assuming the coaches in his conference are worth their salt, you'll see his effectiveness and efficiency drop dramatically.

i also wonder why neither would play a plus defense?

 

Here's the guy who led the NBA in 3pt shooting this past season -- not exactly gonna win many footraces:

What girt said. Also his 75ath is elite for a D2 guard.

i didnt think you could double team while playing fcp

Pretty sure girt just worded his sentence confusing. He was saying in the 1st game against a user he played against an FCP team and in the 2nd game it was either zone or man and he wasn't double teamed.

gotcha

ok i get that but i would expect this guy to be 10 times the player as the first one.

http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=1809467

i think youre looking way too much into this.

Posted by joshj87 on 5/21/2011 11:03:00 PM (view original):
ok i get that but i would expect this guy to be 10 times the player as the first one.

http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=1809467

this guy has taken 70 fewer shots than the first guy...

also looks like he has a harder schedule.

Posted by dacj501 on 5/21/2011 11:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by joshj87 on 5/21/2011 11:03:00 PM (view original):
ok i get that but i would expect this guy to be 10 times the player as the first one.

http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=1809467

this guy has taken 70 fewer shots than the first guy...

I get that but there is a huge difference in their efficanies. Player 1 is around 26 and player 2 is at 15, and common knowledge would say player 2 is the much better player.

Posted by joshj87 on 5/22/2011 12:32:00 AM (view original):

Posted by dacj501 on 5/21/2011 11:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by joshj87 on 5/21/2011 11:03:00 PM (view original):
ok i get that but i would expect this guy to be 10 times the player as the first one.

http://whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=1809467

this guy has taken 70 fewer shots than the first guy...

I get that but there is a huge difference in their efficanies. Player 1 is around 26 and player 2 is at 15, and common knowledge would say player 2 is the much better player.

SOS

The second guy is better holistically (off and def), but I could easily see why #1 is more efficient on offense. 99 per negates the ath/spd deficiency.