Do not equal FSS potentials.

Almost very player I have has differences between FSS potential and what I am seeing on the ratings page.   Before this "implementation" I may have had one difference on the whole roster.   Now I have differences on every player.

WTF?

It could be because they had High-Low potential and got some points so its now down to medium. FSS doesn't tell you the difference between high-high potential and high-low potential. Just throwing in my 2 cents.

Posted by 29707 on 12/2/2011 3:10:00 AM (view original):
It could be because they had High-Low potential and got some points so its now down to medium. FSS doesn't tell you the difference between high-high potential and high-low potential. Just throwing in my 2 cents.

No, it's not that simple. For instance, I had a player I recruited last season who was 78 - high (I still have the Player Thoughts email). He's now a soph and is listed as 89 - low. That's just not possible.

There seems to be an issue with some players being "underrated" in terms of potential in the actual ratings page.

For example my player thoughts email just told me multiple players have high potential in areas that are black and that a couple of players do not have low potential in areas that are red.  I don't know if this is because seble set the range for the color coding differently from the range the player thoughts email takes into consideration or what, but it's confusing.

Posted by girt25 on 12/2/2011 7:44:00 AM (view original):

Posted by 29707 on 12/2/2011 3:10:00 AM (view original):
It could be because they had High-Low potential and got some points so its now down to medium. FSS doesn't tell you the difference between high-high potential and high-low potential. Just throwing in my 2 cents.

No, it's not that simple. For instance, I had a player I recruited last season who was 78 - high (I still have the Player Thoughts email). He's now a soph and is listed as 89 - low. That's just not possible.

As a player gets closer to his maximum, doesn't his potential change from high to low?

I think his point is that a player who is high potential at 78, would have far more to go than 11 points to get into the low potential range.  I would agree with that point as well.

To be clear.  Im my examples in Smith, the world just started and we have not had any practices yet so FSS and the practice page should line up.    In th past there may be one (on the whole team that was off).  Now EVERY freshman has 1-2 ratngs that dont match.

Well ......the assistant coach players thoughts emails matches up with FSS.

I wonder if the practice page is using a wrong scale for the color codes?

I have issues too with the colors not matching the players thoughts email.  Average eventhough its RED and such...

in the other thread seble states the player thoughts email is whack and probably getting cut. The colors are supposed to be real time and accurate.

I have seen plenty of times in the past people complaining about the "CHanges in players potential between recruiting/FSS and the players thought email. . . so, its not news that the players thoughts email is whack, is it?