Ethics question Topic

What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
12/28/2011 3:22 PM
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
12/28/2011 3:22 PM
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?

Excellent point! 

12/28/2011 3:33 PM
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
Excellent point!
12/28/2011 3:42 PM
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
Because this is asking about one specific player that only one specific coach knows the potential for. Asking for potential about someone included in the scouting service is going under the table to get information but for a transfer everyone that is interested knows who to ask for information.
12/28/2011 3:56 PM
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/28/2011 3:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
Because this is asking about one specific player that only one specific coach knows the potential for. Asking for potential about someone included in the scouting service is going under the table to get information but for a transfer everyone that is interested knows who to ask for information.
But what's the difference? Everyone has the same in-game tools to get the information on any player. For HS/JUCO you can FSS or scout the player using scouting trips. For transfers and internationals, you have scouting trips to get potential. Your goal of asking another coach is to save money from using scouting trips. That's unethical and cheating.

Or to make the situation more similar to your scenario. Suppose you are recruiting an international player from Russia who's currently considering UNC. UNC passed on him after signing and you want to know if you should recruit him. You have the option of using scouting trips (the ingame, legit way of getting potential) or ask the UNC coach whether he scouted the player and if so, what were the potentials of the player. Method 2 is the same as you asking for information on a transfer. 
12/28/2011 4:05 PM
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/28/2011 3:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
Because this is asking about one specific player that only one specific coach knows the potential for. Asking for potential about someone included in the scouting service is going under the table to get information but for a transfer everyone that is interested knows who to ask for information.
But what's the difference? Everyone has the same in-game tools to get the information on any player. For HS/JUCO you can FSS or scout the player using scouting trips. For transfers and internationals, you have scouting trips to get potential. Your goal of asking another coach is to save money from using scouting trips. That's unethical and cheating.

Or to make the situation more similar to your scenario. Suppose you are recruiting an international player from Russia who's currently considering UNC. UNC passed on him after signing and you want to know if you should recruit him. You have the option of using scouting trips (the ingame, legit way of getting potential) or ask the UNC coach whether he scouted the player and if so, what were the potentials of the player. Method 2 is the same as you asking for information on a transfer. 
+1 

Very well stated!
12/28/2011 4:34 PM
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/27/2011 10:25:00 PM (view original):
Would it be appropriate to sitemail another coach and ask them about the potential of a recruit they cut? Would it matter if the coach was in a different division?
The ambiguity of using both the words recruit and cut in this scenario has me a little confused. Is this referring to (a) a recruit that a coach signed and then later cut, or (b) a recruit that wasn't offered a scholarship by a coach despite his recruiting efforts?

If the situation is like (a) then I think it's fine to ask the previous coach, but if (b) then I think it would be quite unethical.
12/28/2011 4:52 PM
Posted by nachopuzzle on 12/28/2011 4:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/27/2011 10:25:00 PM (view original):
Would it be appropriate to sitemail another coach and ask them about the potential of a recruit they cut? Would it matter if the coach was in a different division?
The ambiguity of using both the words recruit and cut in this scenario has me a little confused. Is this referring to (a) a recruit that a coach signed and then later cut, or (b) a recruit that wasn't offered a scholarship by a coach despite his recruiting efforts?

If the situation is like (a) then I think it's fine to ask the previous coach, but if (b) then I think it would be quite unethical.
For this example a player that was on a team in a higher division but was cut when a new coach took over the program
12/28/2011 5:08 PM
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/28/2011 5:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by nachopuzzle on 12/28/2011 4:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/27/2011 10:25:00 PM (view original):
Would it be appropriate to sitemail another coach and ask them about the potential of a recruit they cut? Would it matter if the coach was in a different division?
The ambiguity of using both the words recruit and cut in this scenario has me a little confused. Is this referring to (a) a recruit that a coach signed and then later cut, or (b) a recruit that wasn't offered a scholarship by a coach despite his recruiting efforts?

If the situation is like (a) then I think it's fine to ask the previous coach, but if (b) then I think it would be quite unethical.
For this example a player that was on a team in a higher division but was cut when a new coach took over the program
okay, ya, then don't think there is anything wrong with asking a coach about a player's potential since he was a previous member of that team. This might go without saying, but if it's the first season for the new coach then he obviously might not know the potential for the player he cut.
12/28/2011 6:17 PM
My $.019- if someone did sitemail me, I'd probably just go ahead and post the information in my conference coaches corner.  Then, anyone who wants to see it can easily find it.
12/28/2011 6:23 PM
I have no problem with it.  The coach can either answer you or not.  Their choice.  I have site mailed coaches and asked similar things and some reply and others don't.  
12/28/2011 7:32 PM
A usual I think some of you are making more out of this than necessary.   We are talkingh about transfers.  First, there aren't many of them to beging with, second, if they are transfers than either they were cut because they suck or they left on their own because they didnt get any playing time (because they suck).    I don't think  giving out the potentials for this group of players will unbalance the game. 

Trying to compare this with getting info on FR recruits that were scouted by someone else using FSS is an apples and oranges comparison. (IMO)
12/28/2011 8:16 PM
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by blackdog3377 on 12/28/2011 3:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tianyi7886 on 12/28/2011 3:22:00 PM (view original):
What's the difference between asking the potential for a transfer and asking the coach at Cal. for a D3 player potential when I'm coaching at CMHMS, so I don't have to scout CA? Every coach can do it so it's not cheating, right?
Because this is asking about one specific player that only one specific coach knows the potential for. Asking for potential about someone included in the scouting service is going under the table to get information but for a transfer everyone that is interested knows who to ask for information.
But what's the difference? Everyone has the same in-game tools to get the information on any player. For HS/JUCO you can FSS or scout the player using scouting trips. For transfers and internationals, you have scouting trips to get potential. Your goal of asking another coach is to save money from using scouting trips. That's unethical and cheating.

Or to make the situation more similar to your scenario. Suppose you are recruiting an international player from Russia who's currently considering UNC. UNC passed on him after signing and you want to know if you should recruit him. You have the option of using scouting trips (the ingame, legit way of getting potential) or ask the UNC coach whether he scouted the player and if so, what were the potentials of the player. Method 2 is the same as you asking for information on a transfer. 
This is different because the coach of the transferring player did not pay for the info, he got it by being the coach. That's different than recruiting an international
12/28/2011 8:37 PM
The coach who recruited the player paid for the info last season. There are in-game tools for you to find out the potential of a player, whether it be transfers, juco, internationals, or high school players. No matter how you put it, a coach who sitemails for potential is trying to save recruiting money so he doesn't have to spend the money on scouting trips. 
12/28/2011 8:44 PM
◂ Prev 12345 Next ▸
Ethics question Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.