Posted by caesari on 5/15/2012 8:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ryrun on 5/15/2012 4:59:00 PM (view original):
I'm a bit surprised HD is allowing him to charge for this and advertise about it on the boards. You can call it a "donation" until you're blue in the face, but it's really a payment for a service. You're more than welcome to pay more for it, but you have to pay (donate) at least $10.
I don't care one way or another on this, honestly. I have a halfway completed tool sitting around in my archives that I once was interested in putting together for people and distributing as open source, but I never had the time to finish it to my liking and it's just gathered dust. So I'd give him a + for the initiative to create it and a - for requiring a donation for it, so it's a wash in my mind.
Again, right now it is only open to donors, but the vast majority of GD users don't have to donate. Basically, this is a "beta test" of his new tools, and he's just letting his donors have first crack at it.
This is one reason that I personally wouldn't purchase it now. We basically had to pay to play beta testers for WIS when they were in the process of implementing potential. Serious question, why would I want to pay to play beta tester again with this thing? What if I donate my $10 and he decides not to go through with finishing the thing? Some of you guys know him, but I don't and I don't play GD, so how do I know he's actually gonna follow through and put out a finished product, that would actually help me with HD, instead of leaving it in beta test stage?
What I would like to see, if he's as good as some of you suggest, is for him to create a game similar to this. Now I'd jump on that in a heartbeat if it was as good as what we've got here. At least I'd think that the guy running the game was "somewhat" interested in how the thing was running. We sure do seem to have zero attention/interest from the people at WIS in regards to HD.