Full court press advantage? Topic

I don't think there's a team in college basketball that plays absolute, 100 percent pressure defense 40 minutes per game.  That just does not exist.  Inevitably over the course of any given game pressing teams end up picking up at half court or otherwise running something other than a full court press. 

7/25/2012 4:04 PM
Posted by disasteruss on 7/25/2012 3:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 7/25/2012 1:53:00 PM (view original):
No team has ever run 40 minutes of FCP/trapping the way that HD's FCP is supposed to be run.  It's a totally ludicrous defense and you would need 10 players with staminas of "120" to even come close to pulling it off in real life.

On another note, I like how I now import HD ratings to real life players.  Andrew Goudelock is lights out.  He's like a 97 per.
Well, considering Arkansas and UAB both ran a defense called "40 minutes of hell", I would tend to disagree. It's not super common, but some teams do it. Bruce Pearl did it at UWM/Tennessee. VCU has done it. Alabama is trying to run something similar now. You just have to have a good amount of depth who are willing to run up and down the floor.

Anyway, as far as the FCP goes in HD, you see an inordinate amount of it for a couple of reasons. The biggest is that it seems like everyone basically dismisses the non FCP and M2M defenses. I'd say it's a pretty even split between those two.


They can call it whatever they want, I watched those games, as I watched Pearl wt UT and UWM.  None of those teams pressed 100% of the time in the backcourt AND ran full-game-long double team traps in the frontcourt for 40 straight minutes.

And no, St. John's wasn't even close to doing that, either.
7/25/2012 4:10 PM
In the Dwight Hardy-DJ Kennedy-like 37 other seniors season, St. John's played a bunch of gimmicky defenses, the full court "soft" press included.  Not even close to the HD version of the fullcourt press. 

People realize there's a difference between picking up full or 3/4 court and an actual press, right? 
7/25/2012 4:15 PM
How about Arkansas's 40 minutes of hell under Nolan Richardson?  or Tulane's Green Waves in the 90's?
7/25/2012 5:00 PM
Posted by isack24 on 7/25/2012 4:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by disasteruss on 7/25/2012 3:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 7/25/2012 1:53:00 PM (view original):
No team has ever run 40 minutes of FCP/trapping the way that HD's FCP is supposed to be run.  It's a totally ludicrous defense and you would need 10 players with staminas of "120" to even come close to pulling it off in real life.

On another note, I like how I now import HD ratings to real life players.  Andrew Goudelock is lights out.  He's like a 97 per.
Well, considering Arkansas and UAB both ran a defense called "40 minutes of hell", I would tend to disagree. It's not super common, but some teams do it. Bruce Pearl did it at UWM/Tennessee. VCU has done it. Alabama is trying to run something similar now. You just have to have a good amount of depth who are willing to run up and down the floor.

Anyway, as far as the FCP goes in HD, you see an inordinate amount of it for a couple of reasons. The biggest is that it seems like everyone basically dismisses the non FCP and M2M defenses. I'd say it's a pretty even split between those two.


They can call it whatever they want, I watched those games, as I watched Pearl wt UT and UWM.  None of those teams pressed 100% of the time in the backcourt AND ran full-game-long double team traps in the frontcourt for 40 straight minutes.

And no, St. John's wasn't even close to doing that, either.
Exactly.

I don't care if a coach calls a defense "40 Minutes of Full Court Press that is Exactly Like They Play it in Hoops Dynasty", it matters what's happening on the court. And there's zero question that no DI team has ever run a press that really even resembles HD's version. The Nolan Richardson teams basically had a hard halfcourt press/trap and fell back into pressure man-to-man. It wasn't even close to the HD model of pressing all the time.

7/25/2012 5:17 PM
I miss Vandy.
The weekly "I hate FCP thread" just has no zing anymore....
"SHHAA...BANG!"...."It's Majik!".... maybe we could combine the two
7/25/2012 5:19 PM
Posted by girt25 on 7/25/2012 5:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 7/25/2012 4:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by disasteruss on 7/25/2012 3:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by isack24 on 7/25/2012 1:53:00 PM (view original):
No team has ever run 40 minutes of FCP/trapping the way that HD's FCP is supposed to be run.  It's a totally ludicrous defense and you would need 10 players with staminas of "120" to even come close to pulling it off in real life.

On another note, I like how I now import HD ratings to real life players.  Andrew Goudelock is lights out.  He's like a 97 per.
Well, considering Arkansas and UAB both ran a defense called "40 minutes of hell", I would tend to disagree. It's not super common, but some teams do it. Bruce Pearl did it at UWM/Tennessee. VCU has done it. Alabama is trying to run something similar now. You just have to have a good amount of depth who are willing to run up and down the floor.

Anyway, as far as the FCP goes in HD, you see an inordinate amount of it for a couple of reasons. The biggest is that it seems like everyone basically dismisses the non FCP and M2M defenses. I'd say it's a pretty even split between those two.


They can call it whatever they want, I watched those games, as I watched Pearl wt UT and UWM.  None of those teams pressed 100% of the time in the backcourt AND ran full-game-long double team traps in the frontcourt for 40 straight minutes.

And no, St. John's wasn't even close to doing that, either.
Exactly.

I don't care if a coach calls a defense "40 Minutes of Full Court Press that is Exactly Like They Play it in Hoops Dynasty", it matters what's happening on the court. And there's zero question that no DI team has ever run a press that really even resembles HD's version. The Nolan Richardson teams basically had a hard halfcourt press/trap and fell back into pressure man-to-man. It wasn't even close to the HD model of pressing all the time.

Nolan's teams ran a FCP off of made baskets or any out of bounds play on their side of the floor.  I watched those games religiously as a Hogs fan and it was as close as you can get to the HD version of a FCP, but I agree completely that it wasn't the same as what is run in HD.  In the halfcourt they fell back into a pressure M2M and would press the ball outside the arc.  I would love to see the HD version of FCP change to be a pressing defense off of made baskets that falls back into a M2M in the half court where you can actually decide which players you want to double team in the half court and which ones you don't.
7/25/2012 8:01 PM
How long would it take for that D to be used by pretty much everybody?  I mean, we already have the HCP/Man option.  Imagine if you could just practice one defense and get those results.

I know, I know, this is not an original proposition: Get rid of FCP as a standalone defense, and allow fastbreak only as a combo offense.

7/25/2012 8:23 PM (edited)
Well, I mean if you want to look at it that way, no teams run a defense 100% of the time ever. Most teams mix zone and man, trap occasionally, and double teams randomly (not constantly). It's just a pointless argument to say "No team runs FCP exactly like HD", because no team does anything exactly like HD.

I was just pointing out that there are teams that are founded upon a pressing defense principle.
7/26/2012 7:53 AM
Most teams mix man and zone?  I think most teams run a primary defense, then switch over to something else if they're getting shredded.  Syracuse or Temple (at least in the Chaney days) rarely stray from a matchup zone unless the defense is getting severely exploited.  Same with just about every team out there that plays man.
7/26/2012 9:56 AM
Posted by disasteruss on 7/26/2012 7:53:00 AM (view original):
Well, I mean if you want to look at it that way, no teams run a defense 100% of the time ever. Most teams mix zone and man, trap occasionally, and double teams randomly (not constantly). It's just a pointless argument to say "No team runs FCP exactly like HD", because no team does anything exactly like HD.

I was just pointing out that there are teams that are founded upon a pressing defense principle.
Not to be a dick, but I don't really think you're getting the point.  No one plays HD's version of FCP ever, at any point throughout the game.  The tag "press" doesn't demand a parallel.  Read what the HD press actually is.  It's not a real defense.  No team runs non-stop frontcourt traps.  I can't really think of a team ever doing that outside of the last couple minutes of a game.  If WIS' version picked up full court but then dropped into a pressure man-to-man, you would have a point.  But there is nothing in the real world like what WIS' FCP does in the frontcourt, and none of the real life examples offered are comparable other than that they are labeled "press defenses."

And I agree with jslot.  Almost no teams have a true defensive mix.  Teams just have one base defense and move to something else for a reason, not just because they can.
7/26/2012 10:32 AM
I'd have to agree that teams don't really run the HD Press in real life, although I'd love to see someone try.  I think you'd give up too many layups trying to trap constantly in the halfcourt.

I do see lots of teams playing multiple defenses regularly, though.  I can't really say whether that's "most" teams, I don't watch college basketball religiously or anything.  But I think it's pretty normal for teams to be proficient in both Zone and M2M (in addition to Press stuff and sometimes a matchup zone).  Lots of times teams will switch it up at the half, or randomly during the game to throw off the other team.  I think teams like Cuse that exclusively run their Zone are the exception.  Just based on what I've seen watching games.
7/26/2012 11:46 AM
Posted by killbatman on 7/26/2012 11:46:00 AM (view original):
I'd have to agree that teams don't really run the HD Press in real life, although I'd love to see someone try.  I think you'd give up too many layups trying to trap constantly in the halfcourt.

I do see lots of teams playing multiple defenses regularly, though.  I can't really say whether that's "most" teams, I don't watch college basketball religiously or anything.  But I think it's pretty normal for teams to be proficient in both Zone and M2M (in addition to Press stuff and sometimes a matchup zone).  Lots of times teams will switch it up at the half, or randomly during the game to throw off the other team.  I think teams like Cuse that exclusively run their Zone are the exception.  Just based on what I've seen watching games.
Thinking you'd be good for the username thread lol.
7/26/2012 11:58 AM
Posted by colonels19 on 7/26/2012 11:58:00 AM (view original):
Posted by killbatman on 7/26/2012 11:46:00 AM (view original):
I'd have to agree that teams don't really run the HD Press in real life, although I'd love to see someone try.  I think you'd give up too many layups trying to trap constantly in the halfcourt.

I do see lots of teams playing multiple defenses regularly, though.  I can't really say whether that's "most" teams, I don't watch college basketball religiously or anything.  But I think it's pretty normal for teams to be proficient in both Zone and M2M (in addition to Press stuff and sometimes a matchup zone).  Lots of times teams will switch it up at the half, or randomly during the game to throw off the other team.  I think teams like Cuse that exclusively run their Zone are the exception.  Just based on what I've seen watching games.
Thinking you'd be good for the username thread lol.
If I told you I'd have to kill you.  I've said too much.
7/26/2012 3:12 PM
◂ Prev 123 Next ▸
Full court press advantage? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.