4 players post-potential.  How do you rank them?

Player 1

Ath: 75
Spd: 100
Reb: 1
Def: 75
SB: 1
LP: 20
Per: 45
BH: 75
Pass: 75
Stam: 85

Player 2

Ath: 65
Spd: 85
Reb: 1
Def: 70
SB: 1
LP: 45
Per: 70
BH: 70
Pass: 65
Stam: 85

Player 3

Ath: 55
Spd: 75
Reb: 5
Def: 75
SB: 15
LP: 50
Per: 80
BH: 85
Pass: 60
Stam: 80
FT:

Player 4

Ath: 65
Spd: 95
Reb: 10
Def: 70
SB: 1
LP: 20
Per: 60
BH: 70
Pass: 80
Stam: 90

It's D2.  How would you rank them as (1) PG; (2) SG; and (3) SF?

My rankings:

PG - 1, 4, 2, 3
SG - 2, 1, 4, 3
SF - 2, 3, 1, 4 (although 4 would obviously be a lockdown defender there)

Thoughts?

PG 1, 4, 3, 2
SG 3, 2, 4, 1
SF 3, 2, 4, 1

Damn, ike, are you just curious to see the responses?  You're, like, good at this.

Ha, I'm always curious to see how people view certain types of players.  I had three spots for these four guys.  I ended up signing 1-3.  4 was a long-distance pulldown option, but I decided to save the money.  Tough to pass on that ath/spd/def , but I figured the other three were pretty solid.

Definitely number 4!

Posted by bowen_brian on 8/1/2012 6:31:00 PM (view original):
Definitely number 4!

Hahaha

In a vacuum #1 would be my top choice for any of the 3 positions by a decent margin.  Given that you have all 3 it seems pretty obvious that 1 is the 1, I'd probably make 2 the 2 and 3 the 3 as well.  I don't really like 3 better than 1 or 2 at SG or SF.

My thoughts exactly, dahs.  I'd prefer more reb at SF, so 3 may end up getting redshirted and just playing backup 2 or 3, assuming I can find a better 3.

Thanks guys.