""That may be true, but it ignores two things:
1. You may inherit a team which wasn't "correctly" recruited (as is the case here with my team).
2. Recruiting doesn't always go perfectly, and you may not end up with a perfectly "correct" team.
Either way, you shouldn't have to adjust how you coach because of a prima donna player making demands.""
You don't have to adjust anything, that's what people are telling you and you aren't grasping. You inherit a bad player, you don't play him and he complains. Guess what, his ******** doesn't actually hurt team morale, cause it's not a real team. At the end of the year he transfers and you get an open scholarship to work with. As I said before, there is NO SCENARIO where this feature would come into play. In actuality, it would be a negative feature if Seble did code it in. Lots of us end up with bad players for whatever reason. We bench them to get them to transfer. Now we end up with RUDY who's just happy to be there and sticks around for 4 years screwing up our team.
Yes, in real life it would be nice to have some kids be team first all the time, but for the purposes of this game, it would never be a factor. NEVER. If there is even a chance, no matter how small, that a player I recruit can't get 10 MPG as a junior, I DONT SIGN HIM. And I guess every coach here agrees but you.