Perhaps the best all around set of evals ever thus far!

Updated through round 3

great evals ben.  i'm with you on Draymond.  I don't love him, but the 3's, dreb and ast with great D was what I needed.  I haven't figured out yet if it's better to have a guy with 54% efg and basically no 3's or a guy with 40% per (111 3's) who shoots only 51.5 efg.  I'm a big believer in 3's though so I went that direction.  With Gilmore and Manu (plus hopefully the next guy) having pretty high efg I'm hoping I'll be ok.  

I've had mixed results with Draymond. I like most of what he brings but the shooting and fouls suck.

I was planning on taking Pena in the 6th. I guess not.

Carlos Peña? Wasn't he in Moneyball?

peja. lol

fyi Ben- I'll likely play Bobby Jones at the 3.

I don't see Harden as being poison.  Playing him at point (maybe) gives me solid D (79 rating) solid assists (24.8%) 824 FTA's and with all of the assists in the lineup with him will make him that much stronger.

I used Harden in the 14-15 season draft.  Won the chip.  He is awesome!  EFG is lowish but he gets to the line so much.  Im not an expert but I don't think that's factored in efg%.

Ready for poison? I'm planning on using 05-06 Kobe. 49.1 eFG% on 39 USG%. Also projecting to use 93-94 McMillan and 87-88 Ewing

Posted by carbonjones on 10/15/2015 4:29:00 AM (view original):
I used Harden in the 14-15 season draft.  Won the chip.  He is awesome!  EFG is lowish but he gets to the line so much.  Im not an expert but I don't think that's factored in efg%.

EFG% is based on FG% and 3PT FG%.

TS% includes FT%

Updated through round 4

great evals. I tend you agree with you on Wade. To be honest, I never understood anyone taking him in round 1, while Kobe often slips to round 3.  Kobe has a higher pts/usage. I suppose DWade can be used as a pure PG as I am doing here with a strong Ast% lineup around him with NAnderson, Lucas and Camby. But as I said, I never understood it. Maybe you have a point that the Wade success has been limited to DH52. I went by reputation and decided I had to give him a try, because maybe the sim logic is just beyond my own intuition, that a high usage low efg player might not be the ideal top pick for a team. Can't argue with the rest of the profile though.

Other owners have had varying success with him, including some owners who have done really well. It's just my personal preference that Wade is in the 20-22 range for me. Other owner's have him much higher. Who's to say I'm right and they're wrong? When it comes to a lot of those first round picks, it's pretty subjective as to who's better.