Posted by scudmissle on 4/23/2011 4:09:00 PM (view original):
but by doing that, monk, it just shifts the emphasis in another direction. doesn't change the effect much. lebron just goes first in the sf round, rather than the pg round, etc. the 100% rule gives us a little bit more flexibility shaping squads. or am i missing something?

oh, man, it's 4 am... going to bed. see ya tomorrow.

Posted by malone9975 on 4/24/2011 10:02:00 AM (view original):
Moses with Lebron would have been a ton of usage esp. With Reggie Miller. I felt certain that I was getting Moses...although there is one that I thought may go sooner than he has but he got a defensive haircut recently so he is a little less valuable.

Posted by longtallbrad on 4/24/2011 9:35:00 AM (view original):
The drat is now unstuck. 

I think Moses was a somewhat more logical choice, with his monster inside game and plenty of FTAs, but I have no problem with Rodman going first in the PF round.  mikee has the best start possible on his rebounding, and maximum positional flexibility as he fills out his starting lineup.  I might have done the same thing.  

I would have been shocked if Moses and Rodman hadn't gone 1-2 in whatever order.

The arguments should start now about the guy left on the table by both me and dh - but missing out on the first two dudes, I want to make sure I have a rebounding beast and some interior scoring.  Time to pinch pennies for one or both of the next couple rounds.

ltb...not sure if youre talking about barkley or one other certain player sure to be taken soon

both were tough to pass up but i didnt want to take a sf in this round(which is were i would have played both guys) and have to rely on my late c pick and even later 6th round pick to find boardsmen....wallace fits really well into the plan i have for this team and he has a great salary...just hope i dont regret passing up a chance to get wade another scorer