Posted by moy23 on 7/24/2010 4:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cbriese on 7/24/2010 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/24/2010 3:51:00 PM (view original):
the evo runs on the 4g network here in chicago... i'm kinda jealous.
4G is more of a marketing term than a technology advantage.
You definitely would know. I know the iPhone is all mktg w 4g ... g meaning generation of phone not network.
Is there not much difference between Sprint 4g vs 3g or Verizon 3g vs LTE (whatever its called)?
The 3GS iPhone was a big technology jump for Apple, but it ran on the same network. The Samsung has a lot faster processor than the iPhone, so were it me, I probably would have opted for that. Like robusk says, though, the integration with iTunes and other Apple products is a big plus. And I love the All Inboxes feature on version 4.0.
While one provider may have upgraded technology in certain areas over another vendor, there are other factors to consider like coverage and oversubscription. If I am traveling across Texas by car, I want Verizon because the coverage far surpasses anyone else. And AT&T's network was/is often unable to keep up with the data demands of iPhone users (FaceTime will only exacerbate that issue). Sprint and T-Mobile's coverage may be great in some areas, but unavailable or oversubscribed in others. Of course, that may not be a problem in NYC or Chicago.