Posted by robusk on 7/28/2010 11:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/28/2010 11:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 7/28/2010 11:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/28/2010 11:16:00 PM (view original):
I'm pretty sure it is the shtick around here to say I got raped in every trade I do cause I give away so much to get one great player - yet I still end up with a winning team every season. I'm starting to enjoy this.Â
I think the idea is that you could end up with better teams than you have. Â If you stuck with a version of your model where you developed players better and were more patient with trades, you would actually do pretty damn well in the post season.
It is a good model on the basic level, you just have not done well at executing.
I would say a budget model of 20 Training, 14 Medical, 6 International Scouting, 20 Prospect Budget, 20 Advanced Scouting, 10 Coaches, 1 HS, 1 College, 93 Player Payroll with smarter trades, more patience at development and fiscal responsibility with contracts and you would be kicking *** instead of being slightly above average.
If your goal is to have a winning record, then stick with your model. Â If your goal is to actually be a threat to win the WS season after season, you need to step up your game.
Fair enough assessment and honest enough. Â I think most of the dismal playoff experience is me not setting playoff pitching and hitting matchups vs my opponent in the past - I did it for the first time this season with Salem. Â I pretty much put my team on autopilot in the past. Â I'm going to change that up from now on just to **** everyone off when I get to the playoffs.
Playoff strategy is overrated. Â I employ it but it is only like 10% of the battle. Â Making good decisions in the first 1-2 weeks of the season is like 80% of the battle.
I make a few changes for the playoffs. Get in a pinch hitter, a pinch runner, shorten the rotation, change the player rest setting, and decrease the leash on starting pitchers.