Posted by MikeT23 on 9/28/2010 11:36:00 AM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 9/28/2010 11:34:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/28/2010 11:23:00 AM (view original):
Player development issue? Maybe the 0 power guys could have been 1-3 power guys if developed properly. I imagine that they are virtually zero 100 power guys.
Possibly, but only partially so. I'm seeing probably at least half of the guys who are under 27 projecting to zero power. All bets are off with the 27+ y/o's because we don't know what their projections were.
Gut feeling says that there's too many zero power guys for a normal distribution of an extreme rating.
OK, signing problem? Tons of players go undrafted/unsigned. Maybe too many 0 power guys are getting contracts. Draft and sign some 2 power guys.
Beyond the first couple of rounds (maybe 7-10, max), you really have little to no influence over who you draft. In the late rounds, you get the 0's with the 2's and 12's and such.
Plus, aren't you always advocating "sign your draftees"? Am I not going to sign a warm body from the 23rd round to fill out my roster because he's a 0 and not a 2?
9/28/2010 12:10 PM (edited)