Yeah, it does.    One simple fact that you either don't know, don't understand or refuse to acknowledge:   None of us KNOW the true potential of a player.   Just because a player loses a point at the age of 24 doesn't mean he doesn't regain the point before the age of 27.   

That said, a sore arm can affect a player for an entire season.   A muscle spasm that causes a player to miss a few games can do the same thing.   We have NO IDEA if it will affect his long term potential.  

All that said, if you're worried over 1 point in a rating, the player isn't worth worrying over.
12/9/2010 9:08 AM
Yes, you are right.  Everyone is wrong.  It really doesn't matter what I say, you'll try to find a way around it because you can.  Easy to do with an opinion.  But then again, I would say a tomato is a fruit and you would try to prove that wrong, too.

Opinions aren't wrong, they are just different than yours.  Move on.
12/9/2010 12:23 PM
Posted by Thunderclese on 12/9/2010 12:23:00 PM (view original):
Yes, you are right.  Everyone is wrong.  It really doesn't matter what I say, you'll try to find a way around it because you can.  Easy to do with an opinion.  But then again, I would say a tomato is a fruit and you would try to prove that wrong, too.

Opinions aren't wrong, they are just different than yours.  Move on.
You obviously don't know Mike.
12/9/2010 12:59 PM
Posted by Thunderclese on 12/9/2010 12:23:00 PM (view original):
Yes, you are right.  Everyone is wrong.  It really doesn't matter what I say, you'll try to find a way around it because you can.  Easy to do with an opinion.  But then again, I would say a tomato is a fruit and you would try to prove that wrong, too.

Opinions aren't wrong, they are just different than yours.  Move on.
Again, these are the words of a man who can prove anything he says.

As I said before, you don't KNOW anything about injury recovery/player development.  You're just guessing.  And it ****** you off because you got called on it.
12/9/2010 1:42 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 12/9/2010 1:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Thunderclese on 12/9/2010 12:23:00 PM (view original):
Yes, you are right.  Everyone is wrong.  It really doesn't matter what I say, you'll try to find a way around it because you can.  Easy to do with an opinion.  But then again, I would say a tomato is a fruit and you would try to prove that wrong, too.

Opinions aren't wrong, they are just different than yours.  Move on.
Again, these are the words of a man who can prove anything he says.

As I said before, you don't KNOW anything about injury recovery/player development.  You're just guessing.  And it ****** you off because you got called on it.

Yes.  You are right.  Thank you for proving me wrong on a suggestion board.  Although this isn't about right or wrong, it's a suggestion.  Glad I could be a part of your ridiculous crusade.

12/9/2010 3:56 PM
Posted by Thunderclese on 12/8/2010 5:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 12/8/2010 4:35:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Thunderclese on 12/8/2010 11:47:00 AM (view original):
Very temporarily.  But you still have time to get stronger once the injury is healed.  And a soreness affects it for a few days...couple weeks tops.  These injuries, as WIS puts it, have LONG term, career affecting results when ratings are messed with.

I.E.  From experience.  As a runner in college, I had a 3rd degree ankle sprain in cross country that ended my season.  I was crutch bound for 2 weeks.  However, I trained properly and ran personal bests in track a couple months later, and furthermore ran better times the following cross country season.  So by WIS logic, I shouldn't have been able to do that because the sprain should have affected my ability to play long term and never reach my potential before the injury.  Bottom line, it's BS.  Minor injuries can be healed and not have long term affects, which messing with ratings causes.
Are you saying that HBD players NEVER regain their lost ratings?    I'm pretty sure you're mistaken.   Of course, if the player is older, they often don't.   That said, speaking from experience, older people don't recover as quickly and often never fully recover. 
No, not NEVER.  But it does lessen the potential.  From the example above, a muscle spasm and 9 day injury drops a hitter's 95 rating for power to 94.  Most hitters peak building power by age 27.  So lets say by 27, he (without further injury, minor or major) acquires a power rating of 97 at his career peak plateau.  If it wasn't for that muscle spasm, he would have been 98.  Furthermore, his power rating when he starts declining usually around age 30 to 32, will be one point higher longer.  
What part of this comment was a suggestion?    Looks like a statement to me.   An factually incorrect statement based purely on your speculation with regards to injury recovery and player development but a statement nonetheless.
12/9/2010 4:12 PM
FWIW, I don't care if you go thru your HBD life believing that a lost ratings point due to injury means a player can never reach his potential but please understand that this isn't a known fact.    There's no way to prove or disprove that it is.    Of course, if a player never returns to his previous high that is, indeed, a lost rating point that was not be recovered.   And he did not, in fact, reach his potential a 2nd time.
12/9/2010 4:15 PM
The original post I had in this thread was a suggestion.  This is after you turned it into something else.
12/9/2010 4:16 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 12/9/2010 4:15:00 PM (view original):
FWIW, I don't care if you go thru your HBD life believing that a lost ratings point due to injury means a player can never reach his potential but please understand that this isn't a known fact.    There's no way to prove or disprove that it is.    Of course, if a player never returns to his previous high that is, indeed, a lost rating point that was not be recovered.   And he did not, in fact, reach his potential a 2nd time.
Yes, Sir, King Mike!  Anything you say!  I don't know what I was thinking posting out of line without your approval for support on something you have no say in.  Lesson learned.
12/9/2010 4:18 PM
I disputed this incorrect statement:

" From the example above, a muscle spasm and 9 day injury drops a hitter's 95 rating for power to 94.  Most hitters peak building power by age 27.  So lets say by 27, he (without further injury, minor or major) acquires a power rating of 97 at his career peak plateau.  If it wasn't for that muscle spasm, he would have been 98."

Nothing more, nothing less.   By defending your moronic and incorrect position, YOU turned it into something else. 
12/9/2010 4:22 PM
It's not about proving anything, or saying someone is making a "moronic" statement.  It's the fact you make something confrontational for no apparent reason just to prove a point.  I'm glad you missed that point...
12/9/2010 4:29 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
No, it is not confrontational.  Ridiculous is saying you are absurd, preposterous and/or laughable.  That is not an insult.  Moronic or "sounding dumb" is.  And I meant confrontational in the means how you attack a suggestion post where you have no say in it.  People are not here to look for advice, but to post a suggestion.  The fact that you are here to police potential interpretations over a suggestion post where no one comes for advice is being ridiculous.  You are flat out, at that point, just being confrontational.
12/9/2010 5:16 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
◂ Prev 12

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.