Posted by moy23 on 11/2/2014 11:41:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 11/2/2014 10:48:00 AM (view original):
Thanks for the links to other studies.
I still don't see a link to the health pocket study mentioned by the dailycallerand the WT.
http://www.healthpocket.com/healthcare-research/infostat/obamacare-2014-premiums-higher-than-pre-reform-market?_ga_variation=1&utm_expid=60784014-14.Zlx56I0SQAqKSdO9tJpZVg.1&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fm.insurancenewsnet.com%2Foarticle%2F2014%2F10%2F29%2Fstudy-women-men-young-old-average-higher-premiums-with-obamacare-a-570830.html#.VFZdh6nnbqA
Another actual study - most likely the one quoted in the WT and dailycaller... Methodology at the bottom.
Quoted from the study:
"Average premium costs for 23-year-old women and men increased 44.9% and 78.2% respectively after the ACA’s implementation. "
Finally, the actual study. I can see why the daily caller didn't link it directly.
The conclusion (emphasis added):
"The examination of unsubsidized health insurance premiums is multifaceted and prone to political misuse. The analysis of pre- and post-Obamacare health insurance in the individually purchased health insurance market demonstrates a clear increase of average premiums across age groups and both sexes. While the degree of increase varied by age and sex, the occurrence of an increase did not. However, the degree to which the cost of consumers’ premiums increased is a more complicated matter than suggested by the premium data."
There's so much going on here. It's not 78% across the board. It's 78% for people who purchse health insurance on their own. Which, prior to Obamacare, was a small percentage of the population due to the fact that carrier could underwrite people based on individual health actors and exclude pre-existing conditions.