South Carolina Topic

Since Obama was Prez when racism disappeared by removing the Confederate flag from SC state grounds, safe to say that it was all his doing? 
6/24/2015 7:17 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/24/2015 7:17:00 PM (view original):
Since Obama was Prez when racism disappeared by removing the Confederate flag from SC state grounds, safe to say that it was all his doing? 
No.... It's still bush's fault. Everything is.
6/24/2015 7:19 PM
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 7:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 7:06:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 6:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 6:51:00 PM (view original):
Go for it. Why not just wipe out all religion while you're at it?
Did Jesus own slaves?


I think we'll put him in the 'non-racist' category. He's cool. He and Honest Abe are a'ight.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there's some ****** up **** in the beginning of every religion. Someone had to invent Jesus. Whoever that guy was probably owned slaves. Or was a murderer.
Good point.... And since I'm arguing like a lib, who needs facts? Libs hate facts! Jesus is out of the cool club.
You aren't really arguing like a lib. Unless you always argue like a lib. All of this looks like standard moy to me.
6/24/2015 7:23 PM
HI!  It's me!  I haven't posted since page one and this thing devolved into this.

I can't tell you how lovely it is to sit out a session and watch the action from the sideline. 

I find it amusing on so many levels, I hardly know where to start.

It started on Page 1 with BL agreeing with me on the flag and now it's page 17 and Jesus.

I love you guys. I guess that's why nick blocked me.

Carry on you crazy diamonds. 

I don't have a flag in this fight.
6/24/2015 8:04 PM
Plusewise separate post because it is warrented….tecwrg kicked everybody's ***.

True story.  He nailed it and the rest is babble.
6/24/2015 8:27 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 7:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 7:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 7:06:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 6:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 6:51:00 PM (view original):
Go for it. Why not just wipe out all religion while you're at it?
Did Jesus own slaves?


I think we'll put him in the 'non-racist' category. He's cool. He and Honest Abe are a'ight.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there's some ****** up **** in the beginning of every religion. Someone had to invent Jesus. Whoever that guy was probably owned slaves. Or was a murderer.
Good point.... And since I'm arguing like a lib, who needs facts? Libs hate facts! Jesus is out of the cool club.
You aren't really arguing like a lib. Unless you always argue like a lib. All of this looks like standard moy to me.
Lol....

Yeah cause I'm all for banning everything that offends people.
6/24/2015 11:17 PM
What's being banned?
6/24/2015 11:37 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 11:37:00 PM (view original):
What's being banned?
Get a dictionary or listen to 2 live crew. Either will suffice.
6/24/2015 11:53 PM
What does that mean?
6/25/2015 12:12 AM
Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2015 12:12:00 AM (view original):
What does that mean?
I do think you're an idiot so I'll go ahead and be more specific

1) get a dictionary
2) look up the word 'ban'
3) you now know what 'banned' means.
6/25/2015 12:19 AM
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 11:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 7:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 7:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 7:06:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 6/24/2015 6:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/24/2015 6:51:00 PM (view original):
Go for it. Why not just wipe out all religion while you're at it?
Did Jesus own slaves?


I think we'll put him in the 'non-racist' category. He's cool. He and Honest Abe are a'ight.
Yeah, but I'm pretty sure there's some ****** up **** in the beginning of every religion. Someone had to invent Jesus. Whoever that guy was probably owned slaves. Or was a murderer.
Good point.... And since I'm arguing like a lib, who needs facts? Libs hate facts! Jesus is out of the cool club.
You aren't really arguing like a lib. Unless you always argue like a lib. All of this looks like standard moy to me.
Lol....

Yeah cause I'm all for banning everything that offends people.
No moron. I'm not asking what banned means. I'm asking what thing(s) you think are being banned?
6/25/2015 12:27 AM
A school in Texas has chosen to mark Banned Books Week by suspending seven books from its classrooms, including works by Toni Morrison and John Green, after parents complained about their children having access to “obscene literature”.

As bookshops, libraries and schools across America took part in the annual celebration of the right to read, at Highland Park high school in Dallas, parents were making their concerns heard about content in books including Morrison’s Song of Solomon, Green’s An Abundance of Katherines and Sherman Alexie’s The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, reported the Dallas News.

Objections were raised to Pulitzer winner David Shipler’s non-fiction title The Working Poor, because it includes a reference to a woman who was sexually abused as a child and had an abortion. Narrated by a dog, Garth Stein’s The Art of Racing in the Rain was criticised for a sex scene, and Alexie’s award-winning novel for its strong language. Also suspended were Jeannette Walls’s memoir The Glass Castle and Hermann Hesse’s classic novel Siddhartha.

According to the local paper, more than 100 people attended a school board meeting about the books, where “parents and grandparents … read excerpts of sex scenes, references to homosexuality, a description of a girl’s abduction and a passage that criticised capitalism” and “sent hundreds of emails to district officials”.

One parent told the paper: “This is not about banning books. No one is advocating that. We want the kids to have access to the books in the library. The problem is having obscene literature mandatory in the classroom and for discussion.”

Now school officials have taken the decision to suspend the offending works. “I made the decision — given the volume and the tenor and just the continual escalation of this issue — that we would pause, take the time to go ahead and create the reconsideration committees and do the work,” said the school’s superintendent Dawson Orr. The books will now be reviewed by committees of parents, teachers and students, reported the Dallas News.

“The real reason my True Diary gets banned? Because it’s about the triumph of a liberal Native American rebel,” tweeted Alexie about the incident. Walls told the local paper, “My book has ugly elements to it, but it’s about hope and resilience, and I don’t know why that wouldn’t be an important message. Sometimes you have to walk through the muck to get to the message. There are so many complicated situations out there. And we can begin to give kids the tools they need to deal with it, if only to say, ‘You are not alone.’”
6/25/2015 1:03 AM
Within two weeks of its 1951 release, J.D. Salinger’s novel rocketed to No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list. Ever since, the book — which explores three days in the life of a troubled 16-year-old boy — has been a “favorite of censors since its publication,” according to the American Library Association. In 1960, school administrators at a high school in Tulsa, Okla., fired an English teacher for assigning the book to an 11th-grade class. While the teacher later won his appeal, the book remained off the required reading list. Another community in Columbus, Ohio, deemed the book “antiwhite” and formed a delegation to have it banned from local schools. One library banned it for violating codes on “excess vulgar language, sexual scenes, things concerning moral issues, excessive violence and anything dealing with the occult.” When asked about the bans, Salinger once said, “Some of my best friends are children. In fact, all my best friends are children. It’s almost unbearable for me to realize that my book will be kept on a shelf out of their reach.”
6/25/2015 1:04 AM
Where The Wild Things Are is a 1963 fantasy picture book. Story and pictures by Maurice Sendak.

This popular children's book was a 1964 Caldecott Medal Winner for the Most Distinguished Picture Book of the Year.

The story is about a little boy named Max.

One evening he is running around the house dressed up in his wolf suit and generally causing mischief.

His mother calls him a "wild thing", to which Max replies that he will "eat her up".

Max's mother then sends him to bed without supper.

In his room, Max imagines a great wild forest, and a sea on which he sails to a place where Wild Things live.


These Wild Things are scary-looking monsters, but Max stares them down, and they make him their King.

But when the smell of good food reaches Max from out of the distance, he gives up being King and sails home in his boat, where his hot supper waits in his room.

Some people complained about Max being sent to bed without supper. They also didn't like the idea of him having a tantrum. (What kid hasn't done that?!) It was banned heavily in southern states when first published in 1963.

Some said it gave children nightmares. This story is very popular with children, so it must not be too scary for them!

If it frightens them so much that they have nightmares, I'd say it may have more to do with the way the book is presented to them than with the book itself.

As for Max being sent to bed without supper, he did have supper in his room, so it's not like he went all night without food.

Over the years, it's been considered to "promote witchcraft and supernatural events", because of the images in the book. I'm not sure how one could come up with the idea that this book promotes "witchcraft and supernatural events".

Is it wrong for kids to use their imagination? I don't think so!
6/25/2015 1:08 AM

The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald, 1925
Perhaps the first great American novel that comes to the mind of the average person, this book chronicles the booze-infused and decadent lives of East Hampton socialites. It was challenged at the Baptist College in South Carolina because of the book’s language and mere references to sex.
6/25/2015 1:10 AM
◂ Prev 1...15|16|17|18|19...48 Next ▸
South Carolina Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.