Posted by tecwrg on 7/10/2015 10:32:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2015 10:19:00 AM (view original):
It falls on you to articulate a harm. No one can prove something will never be harmful.

But you can't articulate a harm because it's harmless.

I think the better quote would be, "there is no argument against allowing gay marriage." -Abe.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2015 11:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/10/2015 10:32:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2015 10:19:00 AM (view original):
It falls on you to articulate a harm. No one can prove something will never be harmful.

But you can't articulate a harm because it's harmless.

I think the better quote would be, "there is no argument against allowing gay marriage." -Abe.

Unlikely.

http://dailysignal.com/2015/05/10/would-lincoln-have-supported-gay-marriage-looking-at-how-liberals-use-him/

Posted by The Taint on 7/10/2015 6:26:00 PM (view original):
I guess heterosexual's should quit giving up their kids then.

Or the retarded ones that can't support them should stop having them.

Forced sterilization is the answer.    Give up a kid, cut the babymakers. 

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/10/2015 6:26:00 PM (view original):
I guess heterosexual's should quit giving up their kids then.

Or the retarded ones that can't support them should stop having them.

Forced sterilization is the answer.    Give up a kid, cut the babymakers. 

Get on welfare, cut the babymakers.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/10/2015 6:26:00 PM (view original):
I guess heterosexual's should quit giving up their kids then.

Or the retarded ones that can't support them should stop having them.

Forced sterilization is the answer.    Give up a kid, cut the babymakers. 

Get on welfare, cut the babymakers.

Can't ID the father, cut the babymakers.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/10/2015 7:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/10/2015 6:26:00 PM (view original):
I guess heterosexual's should quit giving up their kids then.

Or the retarded ones that can't support them should stop having them.

Forced sterilization is the answer.    Give up a kid, cut the babymakers. 

Get on welfare, cut the babymakers.

Can't ID the father, cut the babymakers.

Can't pay child support, cut the babymakers. 

Posted by bheid408 on 7/10/2015 5:50:00 PM (view original):
Only someone as short-sighted as BL would consider gay marriage as being completely harmless. That is no different than saying..., if the entire population of the world was gay and would marry same sex partners and no one would pro-create the end of civilization would happen. "That is completely harmless"!

I take it bad_luck that you would NOT miss your son if you were gay and couldn't have a child?

And don't use the "adopt a child" crap on me. If you are gay and with a same sex partner you canNOT have kids. Heterosexual partners have no liability to homosexuals to provide them with offspring.

Any time your entire argument rests on "what if the entire population of the world did X," you should probably reconsider your argument, whether it's:

gay marriage
withdrawing all your money from the bank at same time
pursuing a career in woodworking
entering the priesthood
virtually anything else you could possibly mention

Also, the population of Earth is over 7 BILLION. We ain't running out of people, Skippy.

Posted by genghisxcon on 7/10/2015 8:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bheid408 on 7/10/2015 5:50:00 PM (view original):
Only someone as short-sighted as BL would consider gay marriage as being completely harmless. That is no different than saying..., if the entire population of the world was gay and would marry same sex partners and no one would pro-create the end of civilization would happen. "That is completely harmless"!

I take it bad_luck that you would NOT miss your son if you were gay and couldn't have a child?

And don't use the "adopt a child" crap on me. If you are gay and with a same sex partner you canNOT have kids. Heterosexual partners have no liability to homosexuals to provide them with offspring.

Any time your entire argument rests on "what if the entire population of the world did X," you should probably reconsider your argument, whether it's:

gay marriage
withdrawing all your money from the bank at same time
pursuing a career in woodworking
entering the priesthood
virtually anything else you could possibly mention

Also, the population of Earth is over 7 BILLION. We ain't running out of people, Skippy.

We would IF EVERYBODY WENT HARDCORE GAY!!!!

people can do whatever they want as long as they are not physically hurting others - that includes gay marriage and it includes not baking a cake for someone because they don't believe in it. this ******* country is full of sissies that have no tolerance for anything or anyone. what ever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me? a bunch of sissies. college kids at columbia need an undisclosed amount of time off because the ferguson non-indictment was so tramatic for them? really? sissies! where is the backbone and tolerance this country once had?

Posted by bheid408 on 7/10/2015 10:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by genghisxcon on 7/10/2015 8:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bheid408 on 7/10/2015 5:50:00 PM (view original):
Only someone as short-sighted as BL would consider gay marriage as being completely harmless. That is no different than saying..., if the entire population of the world was gay and would marry same sex partners and no one would pro-create the end of civilization would happen. "That is completely harmless"!

I take it bad_luck that you would NOT miss your son if you were gay and couldn't have a child?

And don't use the "adopt a child" crap on me. If you are gay and with a same sex partner you canNOT have kids. Heterosexual partners have no liability to homosexuals to provide them with offspring.

Any time your entire argument rests on "what if the entire population of the world did X," you should probably reconsider your argument, whether it's:

gay marriage
withdrawing all your money from the bank at same time
pursuing a career in woodworking
entering the priesthood
virtually anything else you could possibly mention

Also, the population of Earth is over 7 BILLION. We ain't running out of people, Skippy.

Since you can't grasp the concept of it on a world-wide scale I will narrow it down for you....

If bad_luck's MOM or DAD or BOTH were gay and married another gay they wouldn't have had him, according to bad_luck there would be no harm in that. He wouldn't be alive, his wife would be with someone else, (good for her?) and his son wouldn't be alive.

Does he still think that there is no harm in gay marriage now?

that's a ridiculous argument. this world would be far better off without BL being born ;)