2016 Presidential Race Topic

Posted by moy23 on 7/21/2015 6:42:00 PM (view original):
So funny watching him rip the establishment Republicans to shreds.

I actually liked grahams tweet in response to trump giving out his phone #... "So I guess I need a new phone - iPhone or Android?"


I'm gonna need more popcorn cause trumps poll #s have gone up... Presidential polling he is now at 24%, almost twice any other Republican. In Iowa he is at 13% trailing only Walker (22%).
This has to be his peak, and really I think it's easy for people just to pick Trump when being polled. He's a fun character, but when Iowa and New Hampshire elections come about he's going to get his 5-8% or so, that's assuming he doesn't pull a Perot and just drop out of the race all of a sudden.
7/22/2015 3:31 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 7/21/2015 7:48:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/21/2015 7:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 7/21/2015 7:01:00 PM (view original):
The Kardashians have been on for about 10 years.   Americans are not smart.   Watching some rich dude insult other rich dudes is entertainment for the dumb.

Good to see moy, bronx and stine are enjoying his antics. 
Don't pout Mike. Enjoy it. Face it - the spineless Republicans needed a good shake up.

Trump started a veteran hotline today where vets can call and email suggestions to fix the VA so when he's president he can fix it, because only a businessman knows how. Oh and he'll personally respond to some. Kind of brilliant considering everyone thinks he will lose vets after the McCain comments. You have to admit.

I'm not pouting.   Trump is all about Trump.   He doesn't give a **** about vets.   Or moy.   Or politics unless it helps Trump be Trump.   He's a clown.    And, if he were you or I, i.e. not rich, everyone would be saying "What a ******* clown.  Why is he getting press coverage?"

Sure. And if John Ellis Bush wasn't the son of a President, and brother of another he would just be a boring, random guy that hasn't held office in 8+ years. And if Hillary wasn't married to a former President she wouldn't have had much of a political career.

The fact remains that Trump is getting coverage because he's earned it. Damn near every poll shows him on top of the Republican nominees, you can't just ignore him.
7/22/2015 3:40 PM
Posted by stinenavy on 7/22/2015 3:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 7/21/2015 7:48:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/21/2015 7:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 7/21/2015 7:01:00 PM (view original):
The Kardashians have been on for about 10 years.   Americans are not smart.   Watching some rich dude insult other rich dudes is entertainment for the dumb.

Good to see moy, bronx and stine are enjoying his antics. 
Don't pout Mike. Enjoy it. Face it - the spineless Republicans needed a good shake up.

Trump started a veteran hotline today where vets can call and email suggestions to fix the VA so when he's president he can fix it, because only a businessman knows how. Oh and he'll personally respond to some. Kind of brilliant considering everyone thinks he will lose vets after the McCain comments. You have to admit.

I'm not pouting.   Trump is all about Trump.   He doesn't give a **** about vets.   Or moy.   Or politics unless it helps Trump be Trump.   He's a clown.    And, if he were you or I, i.e. not rich, everyone would be saying "What a ******* clown.  Why is he getting press coverage?"

Sure. And if John Ellis Bush wasn't the son of a President, and brother of another he would just be a boring, random guy that hasn't held office in 8+ years. And if Hillary wasn't married to a former President she wouldn't have had much of a political career.

The fact remains that Trump is getting coverage because he's earned it. Damn near every poll shows him on top of the Republican nominees, you can't just ignore him.
Yeah, I can ignore him.   Most semi-intelligent people can, and will, ignore him.   He's a cartoon.   A clown.  He's unelectable.   There is no reason to listen to his blather.

But people will.   Because, as someone mentioned, Americans are not smart. 
7/22/2015 3:58 PM
JUSTIN BIEBER OUTSELLS THE BLACK KEYS
7/22/2015 4:03 PM
THE PEOPLE WHO BUY THE BIEBS MUSIC CAN'T VOTE!!!!!

OR SO I HOPE!!!!
7/22/2015 4:09 PM
BUT THEIR ILK GROW UP TO BE DISCERNING VOTERS
7/22/2015 4:18 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 7/22/2015 3:02:00 PM (view original):
Liberals are supposed, by definition, to question things.  But liberals in America are totally drinking the Kool-Aid on the ACA without bothering to fact check.  You get fed statistics about access to coverage and point to them over and over and over, but the vast majority seem blissfully unaware in the massive gap between access to coverage and access to care with the low-cost plans, the reduced quality of many employer-provided plans made possible by the provisions of the ACA, and the overall reduction in quality of care nationwide that has been necessitated by the additional cut to reimbursement rates that has been necessary to make this thing even remotely in the neighborhood of fiscally solvent.  Find some people who are at least 50-60 and ask them these questions:

How long did you spend at a doctor's visit 30-40 years ago?
How long did you spend 10 years ago?
How long do you spend now?

Odds are that in spite of the fact that, as part of the natural aging process, more things are going to be wrong with most of those people as time goes by, they will still be spending less and less time at well visits.  Certainly the average numbers have shown that trend.  You just can't afford to spend 20-30 minutes with an insured patient anymore, because you're getting paid, in many cases, less than half of what you bill.  So you get them in and out in 5-10 minutes.  You think that improves preventative care?  Or do you think maybe, just maybe, giving patients more time to tell you about all the concerns they've had might make it more likely that you catch problems early?
No one, at least not me, is blindly accepting obamacare. It certainly isn't perfect and doesn't solve every problem with health care.

What I'm also not doing is pretending that healthcare costs weren't already increasing every year prior to obamacare,

And I'm not pretending that employers were shifting more of the cost of healthcare back on to the employees prior to obamacare.

And I'm not pretending that time spent at the doctor (which I'm not sure is the best indicator of quality of care) wasn't already decreasing prior to obamacare.


7/22/2015 4:36 PM
Posted by stinenavy on 7/22/2015 3:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by moy23 on 7/21/2015 6:42:00 PM (view original):
So funny watching him rip the establishment Republicans to shreds.

I actually liked grahams tweet in response to trump giving out his phone #... "So I guess I need a new phone - iPhone or Android?"


I'm gonna need more popcorn cause trumps poll #s have gone up... Presidential polling he is now at 24%, almost twice any other Republican. In Iowa he is at 13% trailing only Walker (22%).
This has to be his peak, and really I think it's easy for people just to pick Trump when being polled. He's a fun character, but when Iowa and New Hampshire elections come about he's going to get his 5-8% or so, that's assuming he doesn't pull a Perot and just drop out of the race all of a sudden.
Yeah, he has no chance.
7/22/2015 4:36 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 4:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 7/22/2015 3:02:00 PM (view original):
Liberals are supposed, by definition, to question things.  But liberals in America are totally drinking the Kool-Aid on the ACA without bothering to fact check.  You get fed statistics about access to coverage and point to them over and over and over, but the vast majority seem blissfully unaware in the massive gap between access to coverage and access to care with the low-cost plans, the reduced quality of many employer-provided plans made possible by the provisions of the ACA, and the overall reduction in quality of care nationwide that has been necessitated by the additional cut to reimbursement rates that has been necessary to make this thing even remotely in the neighborhood of fiscally solvent.  Find some people who are at least 50-60 and ask them these questions:

How long did you spend at a doctor's visit 30-40 years ago?
How long did you spend 10 years ago?
How long do you spend now?

Odds are that in spite of the fact that, as part of the natural aging process, more things are going to be wrong with most of those people as time goes by, they will still be spending less and less time at well visits.  Certainly the average numbers have shown that trend.  You just can't afford to spend 20-30 minutes with an insured patient anymore, because you're getting paid, in many cases, less than half of what you bill.  So you get them in and out in 5-10 minutes.  You think that improves preventative care?  Or do you think maybe, just maybe, giving patients more time to tell you about all the concerns they've had might make it more likely that you catch problems early?
No one, at least not me, is blindly accepting obamacare. It certainly isn't perfect and doesn't solve every problem with health care.

What I'm also not doing is pretending that healthcare costs weren't already increasing every year prior to obamacare,

And I'm not pretending that employers were shifting more of the cost of healthcare back on to the employees prior to obamacare.

And I'm not pretending that time spent at the doctor (which I'm not sure is the best indicator of quality of care) wasn't already decreasing prior to obamacare.


Are you pretending to ignore the fact that Obamacare has utterly failed in it's other goal of decreasing the overall cost of healthcare for Americans, or are you actually ignoring it?
7/22/2015 4:45 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/22/2015 4:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dahsdebater on 7/22/2015 3:02:00 PM (view original):
Liberals are supposed, by definition, to question things.  But liberals in America are totally drinking the Kool-Aid on the ACA without bothering to fact check.  You get fed statistics about access to coverage and point to them over and over and over, but the vast majority seem blissfully unaware in the massive gap between access to coverage and access to care with the low-cost plans, the reduced quality of many employer-provided plans made possible by the provisions of the ACA, and the overall reduction in quality of care nationwide that has been necessitated by the additional cut to reimbursement rates that has been necessary to make this thing even remotely in the neighborhood of fiscally solvent.  Find some people who are at least 50-60 and ask them these questions:

How long did you spend at a doctor's visit 30-40 years ago?
How long did you spend 10 years ago?
How long do you spend now?

Odds are that in spite of the fact that, as part of the natural aging process, more things are going to be wrong with most of those people as time goes by, they will still be spending less and less time at well visits.  Certainly the average numbers have shown that trend.  You just can't afford to spend 20-30 minutes with an insured patient anymore, because you're getting paid, in many cases, less than half of what you bill.  So you get them in and out in 5-10 minutes.  You think that improves preventative care?  Or do you think maybe, just maybe, giving patients more time to tell you about all the concerns they've had might make it more likely that you catch problems early?
No one, at least not me, is blindly accepting obamacare. It certainly isn't perfect and doesn't solve every problem with health care.

What I'm also not doing is pretending that healthcare costs weren't already increasing every year prior to obamacare,

And I'm not pretending that employers were shifting more of the cost of healthcare back on to the employees prior to obamacare.

And I'm not pretending that time spent at the doctor (which I'm not sure is the best indicator of quality of care) wasn't already decreasing prior to obamacare.


I think you are blindly accepting it, or at least blindly accepting superficial statistics about it's so-called positive effects on our healthcare industry.

The reality is that not only does it not solve every problem, it doesn't solve any problem.  Just because problems already existed doesn't mean exacerbating them is ok.  There was what, between a 20 and 30% increase in total healthcare costs in the United States virtually overnight.  That's not part of a trend.  It's a blatantly obvious trend-breaker and tied up exclusively in the cost of administration and cost of meeting the provisions of the ACA.  That's unacceptable, especially when the reality is that it isn't extending access to care, it's rapidly reducing access to care for people who had it previously or would now under the previous laws, and it fails to address any of the real problems with the healthcare industry in the United States.

7/22/2015 5:17 PM
As we know, BL is not capable of independent, critical thought.  He just cuts and pastes from leftyspin.com and hope that nobody calls him out on it.
7/22/2015 6:15 PM
There was what, between a 20 and 30% increase in total healthcare costs in the United States virtually overnight
Yeah, that didn't happen...http://www.factcheck.org/2011/10/factchecking-health-insurance-premiums/

From 2011, the first year after the law was passed but before it was fully (or even mostly) implemented:
Health insurance premiums for employer-sponsored family plans jumped a startling 9 percent from 2010 to 2011, and Republicans have blamed the federal health care law. But they exaggerate. The law — the bulk of which has yet to be implemented — has caused only about a 1 percent to 3 percent increase in premiums, according to several independent experts. The rest of the 9 percent rise is due to rising health care costs, as usual.

And this is from the McKinsey Center's study this year:
Gross premiums for most 2014 plans are likely to increase. In the 19 states, proposed gross premiums are increasing for 65 percent of all exchange renewal products (plans offered in 2014 that were re-filed for 2015). 3 In 2015, therefore, enrollees could see a median increase of 4 percent when they receive their renewal notifications. 4 However, the actual increase they pay could be less than half that amount, given that many people will have the option of switching to a lower-price plan.


7/22/2015 6:31 PM
I know enough people in healthcare from CEOs of hospitals to doctors to nurses to social workers that have to break the news to impoverished people that obamacare isn't actually 'free' for them.

From what they tell me, obamacare is a mess. More damaging than good.


In other news I see the war heroes thing is already fizzling out for trump as he travels to the border in Texas to go beat up on immigration again. Smart move - that's where he has traction. I think he takes a brief drop in the polls and by Friday he is back to 24%.
7/22/2015 6:32 PM

Obamacare has been a failure for the vast majority of the population.     There have been success stories but, if 10 people take a drug and one becomes Superman while the other 9 die, that's not a success.

7/22/2015 6:33 PM
Why on earth ANYBODY would give even a nanosecond of consideration to Donald Trump as a viable candidate for President is unfathomable.

As to Hillary, she strikes me as the least trustworthy person to ever run for President that I can remember.  She's downright evil.  I think America has had enough of Clintons and Bushes in the White House.
7/22/2015 6:42 PM
◂ Prev 1...28|29|30|31|32...575 Next ▸
2016 Presidential Race Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.