I meant the band.

But now that you mention it, I don't see BL treating us to endless copy pasta from any "liberal main stream media site" like you do with your Rush.

Republicans will have six total debates before Iowa.

Democrats will have four, and only have six total schedules.

Bunch of crap. Dems should have a minimum of one debate per month.

Is there any chance Hillary isn't the Dem winner?

If not, why would she debate?

YEAH, UNLESS BIDEN, KERRY, AND WARREN GET IN. YE GONNA DEBATE SANDERS ON INCOME INEQUALITY AD NAUSEUM?

If the DNC creates a debate per month, Hillary would be there.

I don't put any stock in internet polling. Ron Paul probably won every single Republican debate in 2008 and 2012 based on internet polling, and it didn't matter.

I don't think debates have as much effect as they did in, say, 1960, when that ONE televised bout was the only nationally televised coverage either candidate got.  Nowadays, most of the internet generation votes based on their own biases, supported by their media choices that are either wayyyyy left or Fox News.

Posted by genghisxcon on 8/7/2015 11:56:00 PM (view original):
I meant the band.

But now that you mention it, I don't see BL treating us to endless copy pasta from any "liberal main stream media site" like you do with your Rush.

DID NOT!  LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!

Pluswise I haven't posted anything from RUSH (not the band you idiot) in I don't know how long. But you're right about BL.  He gave up on that a long time ago.  Now he makes the same old arguments on social issues over and over again ad nauseum.  He keeps cat fishing and reeling in suckers. 

IF, however, this is a plea from you for actual posts from the RUSH LIMBAUGH site, just let me know.  

I can supply 100 new fresh threads and thousands of pages in short order.  I didn't know you were such a fan.  Let me know if you want it.  I can open the floodgates.  

I also think Dennis Kucinich won the early debates based on polling in 2008.

I was only talking about the internet debate polling. I don't think it means anything other than he has some rabid supporters. The fact he's been leading every Presidential poll is meaningful. Trump still has to maintain a lead for about 6 months, and I'm pessimistic that's going to happen. He's going to fall in that time and those supporters are going elsewhere. Cruz is the likeliest destination for some of them, and Walker should benefit assuming Walker doesn't keep flopping during debates.