Posted by RCBracco on 4/29/2016 4:05:00 PM (view original):
DUMP DRUMPF!!!

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is ahead by 9 points in Indiana ahead of the state's Tuesday primary, according to a poll released Friday.

Trump has 41 percent support among likely GOP primary voters, the American Research Group poll found, followed by Ted Cruz, at 32 percent, and John Kasich, at 21 percent.

Posted by RCBracco on 4/29/2016 4:05:00 PM (view original):
DUMP DRUMPF!!!

It amuses me how so many people on the left think that the John Oliver profile you reference has credibility and registered an impact.

Also, I didn't really dislike Oliver previously, but as a native of Manhattan (who lived through 9/11, etc), his monologue after the Paris Attacks will make me detest him intensely for the rest of my life. As he said, it was just "a$$holes" who attacked Paris, and the French would fight back with their cheese, their crepes, etc. Maybe he realized how out of touch he was, because he didn't make similarly idiotic quips after the the Belgium attack (he ignored it instead) -- maybe it would have been too much to say that they'd fight back with their chocolate. Oliver should be sent back to England and "groomed" in one of the neighborhoods that he and his buddies still pretend don't exist.

Posted by moy23 on 4/29/2016 4:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 4/29/2016 4:05:00 PM (view original):
DUMP DRUMPF!!!

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is ahead by 9 points in Indiana ahead of the state's Tuesday primary, according to a poll released Friday.

Trump has 41 percent support among likely GOP primary voters, the American Research Group poll found, followed by Ted Cruz, at 32 percent, and John Kasich, at 21 percent.

I still think this state is a toss up and could easily go to Cruz...which really ***** up Trumps' chances of getting 1237.

I think you people and your economic policies are from the year 1237.

That's dumb even by your standards...

I'm pretty sure you're against heavy regulation and wealth redistribution.

In 1237 there was no economic regulation. And no wealth redistribution, except from the poor to the nobility via taxation. True just about everywhere on Earth.

Care to rethink your dumbass comment?

No.

I think you should rethink yours.

Can you name an Englishman or two from a few centuries later who changed the whole concept of economy?

Then explain how it has any link to the modern actions of an out of control socialist financial system more suited to the year 1237.

Posted by dahsdebater on 4/29/2016 6:14:00 PM (view original):
That's dumb even by your standards...

I'm pretty sure you're against heavy regulation and wealth redistribution.

In 1237 there was no economic regulation. And no wealth redistribution, except from the poor to the nobility via taxation. True just about everywhere on Earth.

Care to rethink your dumbass comment?

LMAO

WHERE IS THE NEWS on the democratic race. It doesn't exist. It's all about Republicans. There is no Democratic race. It's a baptisim of pre determined candidate by embedded establishment power brokers on the dole for life. And just to make sure the former middle-class, silent and dying off in the droves, can't represent, those more enlightened and deserving leaders from the left will urge and pay and supplement protest and disrupt to the harm and eventual destruction, the very bedrock and foundation of justice they stand upon in an effort to destroy the gentler nation whose teat they suck. And when the milk is dry and the mother gone, those piggies will be lost in a violent anger equal to any third world nation immersed in violence and corruption and starvation and murder. The rule of law is no longer acknowledged by the formally educated populace, or affordable by the newly impoverished majority.

I can hardly wait to shed this mortal coil.

Posted by DougOut on 4/29/2016 6:30:00 PM (view original):
No.

I think you should rethink yours.

Can you name an Englishman or two from a few centuries later who changed the whole concept of economy?

Then explain how it has any link to the modern actions of an out of control socialist financial system more suited to the year 1237.

My God you're a dumbass.

The whole concept of economy? From a theoretical standpoint, sure. From a practical standpoint, no. Nothing changed as a result of somebody writing down the virtues of a free market economy.

And if you really think there was anything remotely resembling socialism in 1237, anywhere outside of maybe the Americas, you are dumb as ****.

Actually, you're dumb as **** anyway. But in that case you would also be roughly as ignorant as a block of wood.

OH…Let's see. I'm a dumbass. Dumb as **** and ignorant as a block of wood.

Good job. For a liberal. Do you have a point?

Do you? Ever?

Enlighten me about 13th-century socialism.

Gladly.

The top guys got everything.

Everybody else was equally miserable.

Posted by Bernie10025 on 4/29/2016 1:27:00 PM (view original):
Hard to see what's on that red shirt. I think Trump will win a lot of gay votes. With what ISIS, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc are doing to them, it's tribal. Obama's (and Clinton's) cultural relativism has left them behind.

If you are only seeing thumbnails, go to My Forums and change the image size to "full".

Posted by DougOut on 4/29/2016 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Gladly.

The top guys got everything.

Everybody else was equally miserable.

Ok, I think your problem is that you don't understand socialism. A weak economy with heavy taxation is not inherently socialist.

Posted by DougOut on 4/29/2016 8:37:00 PM (view original):
OH…Let's see. I'm a dumbass. Dumb as **** and ignorant as a block of wood.

Good job. For a liberal. Do you have a point?

Hi Doug, I'm a Trump supporter and mostly conservative. I thought your post was completely asinine.