Posted by bad_luck on 5/27/2016 2:58:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 5/27/2016 9:00:00 AM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 5/26/2016 4:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 5/26/2016 4:24:00 PM (view original):
Dems trying to deflect ridicule from their probable candidate not even bothering to debate Sanders.
Shame how low they'll stoop, now that they're getting desperate (and with over 5 months still to go).
Clinton essentially has the nomination secured. Why would she debate Sanders? Just like Trump doesn't want to debate Sanders because Sanders has nothing to lose, Clinton doesn't want to either.
"Essentially . . . secured"? Is that like actually secured; like Trump? I guess we should give her a break though, since she had so many different opponents to defeat.
She should debate Sanders because she acted like a freakin' 2 year old four years ago. Now it's another example of her "Do as I say, not as I do." and "Rules are for other people; certainly NOT me." attitudes.
She has nothing to gain by debating Sanders. So she won't. End of story. Sorry.
You sound just like her - "'Cause I said so, that's why.".
She can't have it both ways and expect not to get ridiculed. If it was the right thing for Obama to do 4 years ago, it's the right thing for her to do now. If it's unnecessary now, then it was unnecessary then. Either way, she's wrong at some point. THAT is the end of the story.